Re: [PATCH 10/15] KVM: SVM: Don't "NULL terminate" the list of possible passthrough MSRs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/27/24 14:19, Aaron Lewis wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Co-developed-by: Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 11 +++++------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> index 3813258497e49..4e30efe90c541 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(u64, current_tsc_ratio);
>  
>  #define X2APIC_MSR(x)	(APIC_BASE_MSR + (x >> 4))
>  
> -static const u32 direct_access_msrs[MAX_DIRECT_ACCESS_MSRS] = {
> +static const u32 direct_access_msrs[] = {
>  	MSR_STAR,
>  	MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_CS,
>  	MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_EIP,
> @@ -139,7 +139,6 @@ static const u32 direct_access_msrs[MAX_DIRECT_ACCESS_MSRS] = {
>  	X2APIC_MSR(APIC_TMICT),
>  	X2APIC_MSR(APIC_TMCCT),
>  	X2APIC_MSR(APIC_TDCR),
> -	MSR_INVALID,

Given my comment on the previous patch and then this patch, can't the
MSR_INVALID addition just be removed all together?

Thanks,
Tom

>  };
>  
>  /*
> @@ -760,7 +759,7 @@ static int direct_access_msr_slot(u32 msr)
>  {
>  	u32 i;
>  
> -	for (i = 0; direct_access_msrs[i] != MSR_INVALID; i++) {
> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(direct_access_msrs); i++) {
>  		if (direct_access_msrs[i] == msr)
>  			return i;
>  	}
> @@ -934,7 +933,7 @@ void svm_set_x2apic_msr_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm, bool intercept)
>  	if (!x2avic_enabled)
>  		return;
>  
> -	for (i = 0; i < MAX_DIRECT_ACCESS_MSRS; i++) {
> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(direct_access_msrs); i++) {
>  		int index = direct_access_msrs[i];
>  
>  		if ((index < APIC_BASE_MSR) ||
> @@ -965,7 +964,7 @@ static void svm_msr_filter_changed(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	 * refreshed since KVM is going to intercept them regardless of what
>  	 * userspace wants.
>  	 */
> -	for (i = 0; direct_access_msrs[i] != MSR_INVALID; i++) {
> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(direct_access_msrs); i++) {
>  		u32 msr = direct_access_msrs[i];
>  
>  		if (!test_bit(i, svm->shadow_msr_intercept.read))
> @@ -1009,7 +1008,7 @@ static void init_msrpm_offsets(void)
>  
>  	memset(msrpm_offsets, 0xff, sizeof(msrpm_offsets));
>  
> -	for (i = 0; direct_access_msrs[i] != MSR_INVALID; i++) {
> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(direct_access_msrs); i++) {
>  		u32 offset;
>  
>  		offset = svm_msrpm_offset(direct_access_msrs[i]);




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux