On Wed, 2024-11-27 at 19:15 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > What if we just move these members from hpa_t to pfn_t? It keeps us off > > struct > > page, but addresses some of Dave's concerns about hpa_t looking like a > > specific > > address. > > For tdr I agree with Dave that you probably want a struct which stores > the struct page*. Currently the code is using __get_free_page(), but > it's a small change to have it use alloc_page() instead, and > __free_page() instead of free_page(). > > The only difference on the arch/x86/virt/ side is a bunch of added > page_to_phys(). Thanks. > > Anyhow, whatever you post I'll take care of adjusting in the KVM patches. I'm just throwing together a v2. We have the US holidays this week, so it may be Monday.
