Re: [PATCH v6 07/60] kvm: Introduce kvm_arch_pre_create_vcpu()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/13/2024 2:28 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Hi,

On 5/11/24 06:23, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
Introduce kvm_arch_pre_create_vcpu(), to perform arch-dependent
work prior to create any vcpu. This is for i386 TDX because it needs
call TDX_INIT_VM before creating any vcpu.

Signed-off-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes in v3:
- pass @errp to kvm_arch_pre_create_vcpu(); (Per Daniel)
---
  accel/kvm/kvm-all.c  | 10 ++++++++++
  include/sysemu/kvm.h |  1 +
  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+)

diff --git a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
index 930a5bfed58f..1732fa1adecd 100644
--- a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
+++ b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
@@ -523,6 +523,11 @@ void kvm_destroy_vcpu(CPUState *cpu)
      }
  }
+int __attribute__ ((weak)) kvm_arch_pre_create_vcpu(CPUState *cpu, Error **errp)

We don't use the weak attribute. Maybe declare stubs for each arch?

Or define TARGET_KVM_HAVE_PRE_CREATE_VCPU to avoid touching other ARCHes?

8<------------------------------------------------------------------
--- a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
+++ b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
@@ -536,10 +531,12 @@ int kvm_init_vcpu(CPUState *cpu, Error **errp)

     trace_kvm_init_vcpu(cpu->cpu_index, kvm_arch_vcpu_id(cpu));

+#ifdef TARGET_KVM_HAVE_PRE_CREATE_VCPU
     ret = kvm_arch_pre_create_vcpu(cpu, errp);
     if (ret < 0) {
         goto err;
     }
+#endif

     ret = kvm_create_vcpu(cpu);
     if (ret < 0) {
diff --git a/include/sysemu/kvm.h b/include/sysemu/kvm.h
index 643ca4950543..bb76bf090fec 100644
--- a/include/sysemu/kvm.h
+++ b/include/sysemu/kvm.h
@@ -374,7 +374,9 @@ int kvm_arch_get_default_type(MachineState *ms);

 int kvm_arch_init(MachineState *ms, KVMState *s);

+#ifdef TARGET_KVM_HAVE_PRE_CREATE_VCPU
 int kvm_arch_pre_create_vcpu(CPUState *cpu, Error **errp);
+#enfid
 int kvm_arch_init_vcpu(CPUState *cpu);
 int kvm_arch_destroy_vcpu(CPUState *cpu);



I'm OK with either. Please let me what is your preference!

+{
+    return 0;
+}
+
  int kvm_init_vcpu(CPUState *cpu, Error **errp)
  {
      KVMState *s = kvm_state;
@@ -531,6 +536,11 @@ int kvm_init_vcpu(CPUState *cpu, Error **errp)
      trace_kvm_init_vcpu(cpu->cpu_index, kvm_arch_vcpu_id(cpu));
+    ret = kvm_arch_pre_create_vcpu(cpu, errp);
+    if (ret < 0) {
+        goto err;
+    }
+
      ret = kvm_create_vcpu(cpu);
      if (ret < 0) {
          error_setg_errno(errp, -ret,
diff --git a/include/sysemu/kvm.h b/include/sysemu/kvm.h
index c3a60b28909a..643ca4950543 100644
--- a/include/sysemu/kvm.h
+++ b/include/sysemu/kvm.h
@@ -374,6 +374,7 @@ int kvm_arch_get_default_type(MachineState *ms);
  int kvm_arch_init(MachineState *ms, KVMState *s);
+int kvm_arch_pre_create_vcpu(CPUState *cpu, Error **errp);
  int kvm_arch_init_vcpu(CPUState *cpu);
  int kvm_arch_destroy_vcpu(CPUState *cpu);






[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux