Re: [RFC PATCH v3 24/58] KVM: x86/pmu: Introduce macro PMU_CAP_PERF_METRICS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 20, 2024, Dapeng Mi wrote:
> 
> On 11/20/2024 1:03 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 01, 2024, Mingwei Zhang wrote:
> >> From: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> Define macro PMU_CAP_PERF_METRICS to represent bit[15] of
> >> MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES MSR. This bit is used to represent whether
> >> perf metrics feature is enabled.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Signed-off-by: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx/capabilities.h | 1 +
> >>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/capabilities.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/capabilities.h
> >> index 41a4533f9989..d8317552b634 100644
> >> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/capabilities.h
> >> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/capabilities.h
> >> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ extern int __read_mostly pt_mode;
> >>  #define PT_MODE_HOST_GUEST	1
> >>  
> >>  #define PMU_CAP_FW_WRITES	(1ULL << 13)
> >> +#define PMU_CAP_PERF_METRICS	BIT_ULL(15)
> > BIT() should suffice.  The 1ULL used for FW_WRITES is unnecessary.  Speaking of
> > which, can you update the other #defines while you're at it?  The mix of styles
> > annoys me :-)
> >
> > #define PMU_CAP_FW_WRITES	BIT(13)
> > #define PMU_CAP_PERF_METRICS	BIT(15)
> > #define PMU_CAP_LBR_FMT		GENMASK(5, 0)
> 
> Sure.  Could we further move all these  PERF_CAPBILITIES macros into
> arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h?

Yes, definitely.  I didn't even realize this was KVM code.





[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux