Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] Introduce a workqueue to deliver PIT timer interrupts.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/09/2010 04:23 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:

Is there any chance that using a workqueue might help the problem of
hrtimers firing too quickly?  I wanted to return HR_NORESTART from
pit_timer_fn always, then restart the hrtimer on delivery, but
because of unreliable delivery, it wasn't clear how to do that.

Perhaps the workqueue can be used to restart the timer instead,
avoiding problems of impossibly small timeouts causing hrtimers to
run amok.
It should be rearmed on ACK ideally. How come delivery is unreliable?

BTW, a massive amount of hrtimers (_single_ non-tickless 32-vcpu guest
with LAPIC) results in:

hrtimer: interrupt took 122448 ns

in the host. So don't even need impossibly small timeouts :(

Any idea where that came from? Even looping on vcpus, that took 4 usec per vcpu.

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux