Re: [PATCH] KVM/x86: don't use a literal 1 instead of RET_PF_RETRY

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM/x86: don't use a literal 1 instead of RET_PF_RETRY
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2024 12:13:04 -0500
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20241108161312.28365-1-jgross@suse.com>
References:

Queued, thanks.

Paolo

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] KVM/x86: don't use a literal 1 instead of RET_PF_RETRY
  - From: Sean Christopherson

References:
- [PATCH] KVM/x86: don't use a literal 1 instead of RET_PF_RETRY
  - From: Juergen Gross

Prev by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 00/10] mm: Introduce and use folio_owner_ops
Next by Date: Re: [GIT PULL] KVM/riscv changes for 6.13
Previous by thread: [PATCH] KVM/x86: don't use a literal 1 instead of RET_PF_RETRY
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] KVM/x86: don't use a literal 1 instead of RET_PF_RETRY
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [KVM ARM] [KVM ia64] [KVM ppc] [Virtualization Tools] [Spice Development] [Libvirt] [Libvirt Users] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Questions] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [XFree86]

Powered by Linux