On Wed, Oct 02, 2024 at 07:16:02AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Mon, 30 Sep 2024 19:03:52 +0200 Aleksandr Mikhalitsyn wrote: > > > At this point my question is, should we solve the problem higher and > > > show all the modules in /sys/modules, either way? > > > > Probably, yes. We can ask Luis Chamberlain's opinion on this one. > > > > +cc Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > Your use case makes sense to me, so that we could try something like > > > that, but obviously it requires more work I think. > > > > I personally am pretty happy to do more work on the generic side if > > it's really valuable > > for other use cases and folks support the idea. > > IMHO a generic solution would be much better. I can't help but feel > like exposing an arbitrary version to get the module to show up in > sysfs is a hack. > > IIUC the list of built in modules is available in > /lib/modules/*/modules.builtin, the user space can't read that? So what are we doing about this? Aleksandr? -- MST
