On Mon, 2024-05-06 at 17:31 +0800, Yang, Weijiang wrote:
> > A decent number of comments, but almost all of them are quite minor. The
> > big
> > open is how to handle save/restore of SSP from userspace.
> >
> > Instead of spinning a full v10, maybe send an RFC for KVM_{G,S}ET_ONE_REG
> > idea?
>
> OK, I'll send an RFC patch after relevant discussion is settled.
>
> > That will make it easier to review, and if you delay v11 a bit, I should be
> > able
> > to get various series applied that have minor conflicts/dependencies, e.g.
> > the
> > MSR access and the kvm_host series.
> I can wait until the series landed in x86-kvm tree.
> Appreciated for your review and comments!
It looks like this series is very close. Since this v10, there was some
discussion on the FPU part that seemed settled:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1c2fd06e-2e97-4724-80ab-8695aa4334e7@xxxxxxxxx/
Then there was also some discussion on the synthetic MSR solution, which seemed
prescriptive enough:
https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20240509075423.156858-1-weijiang.yang@xxxxxxxxx/
Weijiang, had you started a v2 on the synthetic MSR series? Where did you get to
on incorporating the other small v10 feedback?
