On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 1:24 AM Huang, Kai <kai.huang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Are you able to send quickly a v7 that includes these fields, and that > >> also checks in the script that generates the files? > > > > Yeah I can do. But for KVM to use those fields, we will also need > > export those metadata. Do you want me to just include all the 3 patches > > that are mentioned in the above item 3) to v7? > > for kvm-coco-queue purpose as mentioned in the previous reply I have > rebased those patches and pushed to github. So perhaps we can leave > them to the future patchset for the sake of keeping this series simple? Yes, I have now pushed a new kvm-coco-queue. > Adding the patch which adds the script to this series is another topic. > I can certainly do if Dave is fine. It's better since future patches will almost certainly regenerate the file. Can you post a followup patch to this thread,, like "9/8", that adds the script? Then maintainers can decide whether to pick it. Thanks, Paolo