On Wed, Oct 09, 2024 at 08:04:49AM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> This series stems from Will's observation[*] that kvm_vm_ioctl_create_vcpu()'s
> handling of xa_store() failure when inserting into vcpu_array is technically
> broken, although in practice it's impossible for xa_store() to fail.
>
> After much back and forth and staring, I realized that commit afb2acb2e3a3
> ("KVM: Fix vcpu_array[0] races") papered over underlying bugs in
> kvm_get_vcpu() and kvm_for_each_vcpu(). The core problem is that KVM
> allowed other tasks to see vCPU0 while online_vcpus==0, and thus trying
> to gracefully error out of vCPU creation led to use-after-free failures.
>
> So, rather than trying to solve the unsolvable problem for an error path
> that should be impossible to hit, fix the underlying issue and ensure that
> vcpu_array[0] is accessed if and only if online_vcpus is non-zero.
>
> Patch 3 fixes a race Michal identified when we were trying to figure out
> how to handle the xa_store() mess.
>
> Patch 4 reverts afb2acb2e3a3.
>
> Patches 5 and 6 are tangentially related cleanups.
Thanks, Sean. For the series:
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
I sympathise a little with Paolo on patch 4, but at the end of the day
it's a revert and I think that the code is better for it, even if the
whole scenario is messy.
Will
