Re: [PATCH v3 25/27] KVM: nVMX: Add FRED VMCS fields

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/24/2024 12:42 AM, Chao Gao wrote:
@@ -7197,6 +7250,9 @@ static void nested_vmx_setup_basic(struct nested_vmx_msrs *msrs)
	msrs->basic |= VMX_BASIC_TRUE_CTLS;
	if (cpu_has_vmx_basic_inout())
		msrs->basic |= VMX_BASIC_INOUT;
+
+	if (cpu_has_vmx_fred())
+		msrs->basic |= VMX_BASIC_NESTED_EXCEPTION;

why not advertising VMX_BASIC_NESTED_EXCEPTION if the CPU supports it? just like
VMX_BASIC_INOUT right above.

Because VMX nested-exception support only works with FRED.

We could pass host MSR_IA32_VMX_BASIC.VMX_BASIC_NESTED_EXCEPTION to
nested, but it's meaningless w/o VMX FRED.



}

static void nested_vmx_setup_cr_fixed(struct nested_vmx_msrs *msrs)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.h
index 2c296b6abb8c..5272f617fcef 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.h
@@ -251,6 +251,14 @@ static inline bool nested_cpu_has_encls_exit(struct vmcs12 *vmcs12)
	return nested_cpu_has2(vmcs12, SECONDARY_EXEC_ENCLS_EXITING);
}

+static inline bool nested_cpu_has_fred(struct vmcs12 *vmcs12)
+{
+	return vmcs12->vm_entry_controls & VM_ENTRY_LOAD_IA32_FRED &&
+	       vmcs12->vm_exit_controls & VM_EXIT_ACTIVATE_SECONDARY_CONTROLS &&
+	       vmcs12->secondary_vm_exit_controls & SECONDARY_VM_EXIT_SAVE_IA32_FRED &&
+	       vmcs12->secondary_vm_exit_controls & SECONDARY_VM_EXIT_LOAD_IA32_FRED;

Is it a requirement in the SDM that the VMM should enable all FRED controls or
none? If not, the VMM is allowed to enable only one or two of them. This means
KVM would need to emulate FRED controls for the L1 VMM as three separate
features.

The SDM doesn't say that.  But FRED states are used during and
immediately after VM entry and exit, I don't see a good reason for a VMM
to enable only one or two of the 3 save/load configs.

Say if VM_ENTRY_LOAD_IA32_FRED is not set, it means a VMM needs to
switch to guest FRED states before it does a VM entry, which is
absolutely a big mess.

TBH I'm not sure this is the question you have in mind.




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux