Hi David,
> On 19 Oct 2024, at 17:15, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: David Woodhouse <dwmw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The PSCI v1.3 specification adds support for a SYSTEM_OFF2 function
> which is analogous to ACPI S4 state. This will allow hosting
> environments to determine that a guest is hibernated rather than just
> powered off, and ensure that they preserve the virtual environment
> appropriately to allow the guest to resume safely (or bump the
> hardware_signature in the FACS to trigger a clean reboot instead).
>
> This feature is safe to enable unconditionally (in a subsequent commit)
> because it is exposed to userspace through the existing
> KVM_SYSTEM_EVENT_SHUTDOWN event, just with an additional flag which
> userspace can use to know that the instance intended hibernation instead
> of a plain power-off.
>
> As with SYSTEM_RESET2, there is only one type available (in this case
> HIBERNATE_OFF), and it is not explicitly reported to userspace through
> the event; userspace can get it from the registers if it cares).
>
> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst | 11 ++++++++
> arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 6 +++++
> arch/arm64/kvm/psci.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 61 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> index e32471977d0a..1ec076d806e6 100644
> --- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> @@ -6855,6 +6855,10 @@ the first `ndata` items (possibly zero) of the data array are valid.
> the guest issued a SYSTEM_RESET2 call according to v1.1 of the PSCI
> specification.
>
> + - for arm64, data[0] is set to KVM_SYSTEM_EVENT_SHUTDOWN_FLAG_PSCI_OFF2
> + if the guest issued a SYSTEM_OFF2 call according to v1.3 of the PSCI
> + specification.
> +
> - for RISC-V, data[0] is set to the value of the second argument of the
> ``sbi_system_reset`` call.
>
> @@ -6888,6 +6892,13 @@ either:
> - Deny the guest request to suspend the VM. See ARM DEN0022D.b 5.19.2
> "Caller responsibilities" for possible return values.
>
> +Hibernation using the PSCI SYSTEM_OFF2 call is enabled when PSCI v1.3
> +is enabled. If a guest invokes the PSCI SYSTEM_OFF2 function, KVM will
> +exit to userspace with the KVM_SYSTEM_EVENT_SHUTDOWN event type and with
> +data[0] set to KVM_SYSTEM_EVENT_SHUTDOWN_FLAG_PSCI_OFF2. The only
> +supported hibernate type for the SYSTEM_OFF2 function is HIBERNATE_OFF
> +0x0).
I don’t think that ‘0x0’ adds something to what’s already explained
before, IMO.
> +
> ::
>
> /* KVM_EXIT_IOAPIC_EOI */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> index 964df31da975..66736ff04011 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> @@ -484,6 +484,12 @@ enum {
> */
> #define KVM_SYSTEM_EVENT_RESET_FLAG_PSCI_RESET2 (1ULL << 0)
>
> +/*
> + * Shutdown caused by a PSCI v1.3 SYSTEM_OFF2 call.
> + * Valid only when the system event has a type of KVM_SYSTEM_EVENT_SHUTDOWN.
> + */
> +#define KVM_SYSTEM_EVENT_SHUTDOWN_FLAG_PSCI_OFF2 (1ULL << 0)
> +
> /* run->fail_entry.hardware_entry_failure_reason codes. */
> #define KVM_EXIT_FAIL_ENTRY_CPU_UNSUPPORTED (1ULL << 0)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/psci.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/psci.c
> index 1f69b667332b..df834f2e928e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/psci.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/psci.c
> @@ -194,6 +194,12 @@ static void kvm_psci_system_off(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> kvm_prepare_system_event(vcpu, KVM_SYSTEM_EVENT_SHUTDOWN, 0);
> }
>
> +static void kvm_psci_system_off2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + kvm_prepare_system_event(vcpu, KVM_SYSTEM_EVENT_SHUTDOWN,
> + KVM_SYSTEM_EVENT_SHUTDOWN_FLAG_PSCI_OFF2);
> +}
> +
> static void kvm_psci_system_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> kvm_prepare_system_event(vcpu, KVM_SYSTEM_EVENT_RESET, 0);
> @@ -358,6 +364,11 @@ static int kvm_psci_1_x_call(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 minor)
> if (minor >= 1)
> val = 0;
> break;
> + case PSCI_1_3_FN_SYSTEM_OFF2:
> + case PSCI_1_3_FN64_SYSTEM_OFF2:
> + if (minor >= 3)
> + val = PSCI_1_3_OFF_TYPE_HIBERNATE_OFF;
> + break;
> }
> break;
> case PSCI_1_0_FN_SYSTEM_SUSPEND:
> @@ -392,6 +403,39 @@ static int kvm_psci_1_x_call(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 minor)
> break;
> }
> break;
> + case PSCI_1_3_FN_SYSTEM_OFF2:
> + kvm_psci_narrow_to_32bit(vcpu);
> + fallthrough;
> + case PSCI_1_3_FN64_SYSTEM_OFF2:
> + if (minor < 3)
> + break;
> +
> + arg = smccc_get_arg1(vcpu);
> + /*
> + * PSCI v1.3 issue F.b requires that zero be accepted to mean
> + * HIBERNATE_OFF (in line with pre-publication versions of the
> + * spec, and thus some actual implementations in the wild).
> + * The second argument must be zero.
> + */
> + if ((arg && arg != PSCI_1_3_OFF_TYPE_HIBERNATE_OFF) ||
> + smccc_get_arg2(vcpu) != 0) {
> + val = PSCI_RET_INVALID_PARAMS;
> + break;
> + }
> + kvm_psci_system_off2(vcpu);
> + /*
> + * We shouldn't be going back to guest VCPU after
> + * receiving SYSTEM_OFF2 request.
> + *
> + * If user space accidentally/deliberately resumes
> + * guest VCPU after SYSTEM_OFF2 request then guest
> + * VCPU should see internal failure from PSCI return
> + * value. To achieve this, we preload r0 (or x0) with
> + * PSCI return value INTERNAL_FAILURE.
> + */
> + val = PSCI_RET_INTERNAL_FAILURE;
> + ret = 0;
> + break;
Other than that it looks good to me:
Reviewed-by: Miguel Luis <miguel.luis@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks,
Miguel
> default:
> return kvm_psci_0_2_call(vcpu);
> }
> --
> 2.44.0
>
