On 10/21/24 00:51, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
> The hypervisor should not be intercepting GUEST_TSC_FREQ MSR(0xcOO10134)
> when Secure TSC is enabled. A #VC exception will be generated if the
> GUEST_TSC_FREQ MSR is being intercepted. If this should occur and SecureTSC
> is enabled, terminate guest execution.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
Just a minor comment/question below.
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h | 1 +
> arch/x86/coco/sev/core.c | 8 ++++++++
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> index 3ae84c3b8e6d..233be13cc21f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> @@ -608,6 +608,7 @@
> #define MSR_AMD_PERF_CTL 0xc0010062
> #define MSR_AMD_PERF_STATUS 0xc0010063
> #define MSR_AMD_PSTATE_DEF_BASE 0xc0010064
> +#define MSR_AMD64_GUEST_TSC_FREQ 0xc0010134
> #define MSR_AMD64_OSVW_ID_LENGTH 0xc0010140
> #define MSR_AMD64_OSVW_STATUS 0xc0010141
> #define MSR_AMD_PPIN_CTL 0xc00102f0
> diff --git a/arch/x86/coco/sev/core.c b/arch/x86/coco/sev/core.c
> index 2ad7773458c0..4e9b1cc1f26b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/coco/sev/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/coco/sev/core.c
> @@ -1332,6 +1332,14 @@ static enum es_result vc_handle_msr(struct ghcb *ghcb, struct es_em_ctxt *ctxt)
> return ES_OK;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * GUEST_TSC_FREQ should not be intercepted when Secure TSC is
> + * enabled. Terminate the SNP guest when the interception is enabled.
> + */
> + if (regs->cx == MSR_AMD64_GUEST_TSC_FREQ && cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_GUEST_SNP_SECURE_TSC))
Should the cc_platform_has() check be changed into a check against
sev_status directly (similar to the DEBUG_SWAP support)? Just in case
this handler ends up getting used in early code where cc_platform_has()
can't be used.
Thanks,
Tom
> + return ES_VMM_ERROR;
> +
> +
> ghcb_set_rcx(ghcb, regs->cx);
> if (exit_info_1) {
> ghcb_set_rax(ghcb, regs->ax);
