David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On 10.10.24 19:14, Ackerley Tng wrote:
>> David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>> Ahoihoi,
>>>
>>> while talking to a bunch of folks at LPC about guest_memfd, it was
>>> raised that there isn't really a place for people to discuss the
>>> development of guest_memfd on a regular basis.
>>>
>>> There is a KVM upstream call, but guest_memfd is on its way of not being
>>> guest_memfd specific ("library") and there is the bi-weekly MM alignment
>>> call, but we're not going to hijack that meeting completely + a lot of
>>> guest_memfd stuff doesn't need all the MM experts ;)
>>>
>>> So my proposal would be to have a bi-weekly meeting, to discuss ongoing
>>> development of guest_memfd, in particular:
>>>
>>> (1) Organize development: (do we need 3 different implementation
>>> of mmap() support ? ;) )
>>> (2) Discuss current progress and challenges
>>> (3) Cover future ideas and directions
>>> (4) Whatever else makes sense
>>>
>>> Topic-wise it's relatively clear: guest_memfd extensions were one of the
>>> hot topics at LPC ;)
>>>
>>> I would suggest every second Thursdays from 9:00 - 10:00am PDT (GMT-7),
>>> starting Thursday next week (2024-10-17).
>>
>> This time works for me as well, thank you!
>>
>>>
>>> We would be using Google Meet.
>>
>> Thanks too! Shall we use http://meet.google.com/wxp-wtju-jzw ?
>
> I assume that room cannot be joined when you are not around (e.g., using
> it right now makes me "Ask to join"). Can that be changed?
Thanks for testing and pointing this out! My bad. I've changed the
settings to make it open to all, and tested it using my personal gmail
account.
Please let me know if it still doesn't work for anyone!
> Otherwise, I think I can provide a room (Red Hat is using Google
> Mail/Meet etc.)
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> David / dhildenb
