On Wed, Oct 09, 2024 at 02:03:48PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> I would rather convert these three attributes to synthetic X86_FEATUREs
> next to X86_FEATURE_TDX_GUEST. I suggested it once.
And back then I answered that splitting the coco checks between a X86_FEATURE
and a cc_platform ones is confusing. Which ones do I use, X86_FEATURE or
cc_platform?
Oh, for SNP or TDX I use cpu_feature_enabled() but in generic code I use
cc_platform.
Sounds confusing to me.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
