On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 2:16 PM Ashish Kalra <Ashish.Kalra@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@xxxxxxx>
>
> Define new bit-field definitions returned by SNP_PLATFORM_STATUS command
> such as new capabilities like SNP_FEATURE_INFO command availability,
> ciphertext hiding enabled and capability.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> include/uapi/linux/psp-sev.h | 10 +++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/psp-sev.h b/include/uapi/linux/psp-sev.h
> index 832c15d9155b..dd7298b67b37 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/psp-sev.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/psp-sev.h
> @@ -178,6 +178,10 @@ struct sev_user_data_get_id2 {
> * @mask_chip_id: whether chip id is present in attestation reports or not
> * @mask_chip_key: whether attestation reports are signed or not
> * @vlek_en: VLEK (Version Loaded Endorsement Key) hashstick is loaded
> + * @feature_info: whether SNP_FEATURE_INFO command is available
> + * @rapl_dis: whether RAPL is disabled
> + * @ciphertext_hiding_cap: whether platform has ciphertext hiding capability
> + * @ciphertext_hiding_en: whether ciphertext hiding is enabled
> * @rsvd1: reserved
> * @guest_count: the number of guest currently managed by the firmware
> * @current_tcb_version: current TCB version
> @@ -193,7 +197,11 @@ struct sev_user_data_snp_status {
> __u32 mask_chip_id:1; /* Out */
> __u32 mask_chip_key:1; /* Out */
> __u32 vlek_en:1; /* Out */
> - __u32 rsvd1:29;
> + __u32 feature_info:1; /* Out */
Is this the right way for userspace to check if a command is
available? None of the other commands are detailed like this one is.
> + __u32 rapl_dis:1; /* Out */
> + __u32 ciphertext_hiding_cap:1; /* Out */
> + __u32 ciphertext_hiding_en:1; /* Out */
> + __u32 rsvd1:25;
> __u32 guest_count; /* Out */
> __u64 current_tcb_version; /* Out */
> __u64 reported_tcb_version; /* Out */
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
