On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 06:58:06PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 8/30/24 10:34, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 11:25:37AM +0800, Chao Gao wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 03:48:05PM -0700, Rick Edgecombe wrote:
> > > > From: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > +static int __init setup_kvm_tdx_caps(void)
> > > > +{
> > > > + const struct tdx_sysinfo_td_conf *td_conf = &tdx_sysinfo->td_conf;
> > > > + u64 kvm_supported;
> > > > + int i;
> > > > +
> > > > + kvm_tdx_caps = kzalloc(sizeof(*kvm_tdx_caps) +
> > > > + sizeof(struct kvm_tdx_cpuid_config) * td_conf->num_cpuid_config,
> > >
> > > struct_size()
> > >
> > > > + GFP_KERNEL);
> > > > + if (!kvm_tdx_caps)
> > > > + return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > This will go away with the dropping of struct kvm_tdx_caps. Should be checked
> > for other places though.
>
> What do you mean exactly by dropping of struct kvm_tdx_caps?
I think we can initialize the data as needed based on td_conf.
Regards,
Tony
