On Tue, Sep 10, 2024, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 8/29/24 21:46, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote: > > > This leads to another topic that defining all the TDX structure in this > > > patch seems unfriendly for review. It seems better to put the > > > introduction of definition and its user in a single patch. > > > > Yea. > > I don't know, it's easier to check a single patch against the manual. I > don't have any objection to leaving everything here instead of scattering it > over multiple patches, in fact I think I prefer it. +1. There is so much to understand with TDX that trying to provide some form of temporal locality between architectural definitions and the first code to use a given definition seems futile/pointless.
