Re: [RFC PATCH v3 12/58] perf: core/x86: Register a new vector for KVM GUEST PMI

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Mi, Dapeng" <dapeng1.mi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

On 9/10/2024 6:11 AM, Colton Lewis wrote:
Hello,

Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

From: Xiong Zhang <xiong.y.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Create a new vector in the host IDT for kvm guest PMI handling within
mediated passthrough vPMU. In addition, guest PMI handler registration
is added into x86_set_kvm_irq_handler().
This is the preparation work to support mediated passthrough vPMU to
handle kvm guest PMIs without interference from PMI handler of the host
PMU.
Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Xiong Zhang <xiong.y.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Yongwei Ma <yongwei.ma@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
   arch/x86/include/asm/hardirq.h                |  1 +
   arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h               |  1 +
   arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h            |  5 ++++-
   arch/x86/kernel/idt.c                         |  1 +
   arch/x86/kernel/irq.c                         | 21 +++++++++++++++++++
   .../beauty/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h |  5 ++++-
   6 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/hardirq.h
b/arch/x86/include/asm/hardirq.h
index c67fa6ad098a..42a396763c8d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/hardirq.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/hardirq.h
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ typedef struct {
   	unsigned int kvm_posted_intr_ipis;
   	unsigned int kvm_posted_intr_wakeup_ipis;
   	unsigned int kvm_posted_intr_nested_ipis;
+	unsigned int kvm_guest_pmis;
   #endif
   	unsigned int x86_platform_ipis;	/* arch dependent */
   	unsigned int apic_perf_irqs;
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h
b/arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h
index d4f24499b256..7b1e3e542b1d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h
@@ -745,6 +745,7 @@ DECLARE_IDTENTRY_SYSVEC(IRQ_WORK_VECTOR,
sysvec_irq_work);
DECLARE_IDTENTRY_SYSVEC(POSTED_INTR_VECTOR, sysvec_kvm_posted_intr_ipi);
   DECLARE_IDTENTRY_SYSVEC(POSTED_INTR_WAKEUP_VECTOR,
sysvec_kvm_posted_intr_wakeup_ipi);
   DECLARE_IDTENTRY_SYSVEC(POSTED_INTR_NESTED_VECTOR,
sysvec_kvm_posted_intr_nested_ipi);
+DECLARE_IDTENTRY_SYSVEC(KVM_GUEST_PMI_VECTOR,
sysvec_kvm_guest_pmi_handler);
   #else
   # define fred_sysvec_kvm_posted_intr_ipi		NULL
   # define fred_sysvec_kvm_posted_intr_wakeup_ipi		NULL
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h
b/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h
index 13aea8fc3d45..ada270e6f5cb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h
@@ -77,7 +77,10 @@
    */
   #define IRQ_WORK_VECTOR			0xf6
-/* 0xf5 - unused, was UV_BAU_MESSAGE */
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM)
+#define KVM_GUEST_PMI_VECTOR		0xf5
+#endif
+
   #define DEFERRED_ERROR_VECTOR		0xf4
   /* Vector on which hypervisor callbacks will be delivered */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/idt.c b/arch/x86/kernel/idt.c
index f445bec516a0..0bec4c7e2308 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/idt.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/idt.c
@@ -157,6 +157,7 @@ static const __initconst struct idt_data apic_idts[]
= {
   	INTG(POSTED_INTR_VECTOR,		asm_sysvec_kvm_posted_intr_ipi),
INTG(POSTED_INTR_WAKEUP_VECTOR, asm_sysvec_kvm_posted_intr_wakeup_ipi), INTG(POSTED_INTR_NESTED_VECTOR, asm_sysvec_kvm_posted_intr_nested_ipi),
+	INTG(KVM_GUEST_PMI_VECTOR,		asm_sysvec_kvm_guest_pmi_handler),

There is a subtle inconsistency in that this code is guarded on
CONFIG_HAVE_KVM when the #define KVM_GUEST_PMI_VECTOR is guarded on
CONFIG_KVM. Beats me why there are two different flags that are so
similar, but it is possible they have different values leading to
compilation errors.

I happened to hit this compilation error because make defconfig will
define CONFIG_HAVE_KVM but not CONFIG_KVM. CONFIG_KVM is the more strict
of the two because it depends on CONFIG_HAVE_KVM.

This code should also be guarded on CONFIG_KVM.

Hi Colton,

 what's you kernel base? In latest code base, the CONFIG_HAVE_KVM has been
dropped and this part of code has been guarded by CONFIG_KVM.

Please see commit dcf0926e9b89 "x86: replace CONFIG_HAVE_KVM with
IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM)". Thanks.

My kernel base was older than that. Glad to know it is no longer an
issue.


   # endif
   # ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_WORK
   	INTG(IRQ_WORK_VECTOR,			asm_sysvec_irq_work),
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
index 18cd418fe106..b29714e23fc4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
@@ -183,6 +183,12 @@ int arch_show_interrupts(struct seq_file *p, int
prec)
   		seq_printf(p, "%10u ",
   			   irq_stats(j)->kvm_posted_intr_wakeup_ipis);
   	seq_puts(p, "  Posted-interrupt wakeup event\n");
+
+	seq_printf(p, "%*s: ", prec, "VPMU");
+	for_each_online_cpu(j)
+		seq_printf(p, "%10u ",
+			   irq_stats(j)->kvm_guest_pmis);
+	seq_puts(p, " KVM GUEST PMI\n");
   #endif
   #ifdef CONFIG_X86_POSTED_MSI
   	seq_printf(p, "%*s: ", prec, "PMN");
@@ -311,6 +317,7 @@ DEFINE_IDTENTRY_SYSVEC(sysvec_x86_platform_ipi)
   #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM)
   static void dummy_handler(void) {}
   static void (*kvm_posted_intr_wakeup_handler)(void) = dummy_handler;
+static void (*kvm_guest_pmi_handler)(void) = dummy_handler;
   void x86_set_kvm_irq_handler(u8 vector, void (*handler)(void))
   {
@@ -321,6 +328,10 @@ void x86_set_kvm_irq_handler(u8 vector, void
(*handler)(void))
   	    (handler == dummy_handler ||
   	     kvm_posted_intr_wakeup_handler == dummy_handler))
   		kvm_posted_intr_wakeup_handler = handler;
+	else if (vector == KVM_GUEST_PMI_VECTOR &&
+		 (handler == dummy_handler ||
+		  kvm_guest_pmi_handler == dummy_handler))
+		kvm_guest_pmi_handler = handler;
   	else
   		WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
@@ -356,6 +367,16 @@
DEFINE_IDTENTRY_SYSVEC_SIMPLE(sysvec_kvm_posted_intr_nested_ipi)
   	apic_eoi();
   	inc_irq_stat(kvm_posted_intr_nested_ipis);
   }
+
+/*
+ * Handler for KVM_GUEST_PMI_VECTOR.
+ */
+DEFINE_IDTENTRY_SYSVEC(sysvec_kvm_guest_pmi_handler)
+{
+	apic_eoi();
+	inc_irq_stat(kvm_guest_pmis);
+	kvm_guest_pmi_handler();
+}
   #endif
   #ifdef CONFIG_X86_POSTED_MSI
diff --git a/tools/perf/trace/beauty/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h
b/tools/perf/trace/beauty/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h
index 13aea8fc3d45..670dcee46631 100644
--- a/tools/perf/trace/beauty/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h
+++ b/tools/perf/trace/beauty/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h
@@ -77,7 +77,10 @@
    */
   #define IRQ_WORK_VECTOR			0xf6
-/* 0xf5 - unused, was UV_BAU_MESSAGE */
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM)
+#define KVM_GUEST_PMI_VECTOR           0xf5
+#endif
+
   #define DEFERRED_ERROR_VECTOR		0xf4
   /* Vector on which hypervisor callbacks will be delivered */




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux