Hello,
Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
From: Xiong Zhang <xiong.y.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Create a new vector in the host IDT for kvm guest PMI handling within
mediated passthrough vPMU. In addition, guest PMI handler registration
is added into x86_set_kvm_irq_handler().
This is the preparation work to support mediated passthrough vPMU to
handle kvm guest PMIs without interference from PMI handler of the host
PMU.
Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Xiong Zhang <xiong.y.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Yongwei Ma <yongwei.ma@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/hardirq.h | 1 +
arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h | 1 +
arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h | 5 ++++-
arch/x86/kernel/idt.c | 1 +
arch/x86/kernel/irq.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++
.../beauty/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h | 5 ++++-
6 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/hardirq.h
b/arch/x86/include/asm/hardirq.h
index c67fa6ad098a..42a396763c8d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/hardirq.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/hardirq.h
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ typedef struct {
unsigned int kvm_posted_intr_ipis;
unsigned int kvm_posted_intr_wakeup_ipis;
unsigned int kvm_posted_intr_nested_ipis;
+ unsigned int kvm_guest_pmis;
#endif
unsigned int x86_platform_ipis; /* arch dependent */
unsigned int apic_perf_irqs;
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h
b/arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h
index d4f24499b256..7b1e3e542b1d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h
@@ -745,6 +745,7 @@ DECLARE_IDTENTRY_SYSVEC(IRQ_WORK_VECTOR,
sysvec_irq_work);
DECLARE_IDTENTRY_SYSVEC(POSTED_INTR_VECTOR, sysvec_kvm_posted_intr_ipi);
DECLARE_IDTENTRY_SYSVEC(POSTED_INTR_WAKEUP_VECTOR,
sysvec_kvm_posted_intr_wakeup_ipi);
DECLARE_IDTENTRY_SYSVEC(POSTED_INTR_NESTED_VECTOR,
sysvec_kvm_posted_intr_nested_ipi);
+DECLARE_IDTENTRY_SYSVEC(KVM_GUEST_PMI_VECTOR,
sysvec_kvm_guest_pmi_handler);
#else
# define fred_sysvec_kvm_posted_intr_ipi NULL
# define fred_sysvec_kvm_posted_intr_wakeup_ipi NULL
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h
b/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h
index 13aea8fc3d45..ada270e6f5cb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h
@@ -77,7 +77,10 @@
*/
#define IRQ_WORK_VECTOR 0xf6
-/* 0xf5 - unused, was UV_BAU_MESSAGE */
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM)
+#define KVM_GUEST_PMI_VECTOR 0xf5
+#endif
+
#define DEFERRED_ERROR_VECTOR 0xf4
/* Vector on which hypervisor callbacks will be delivered */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/idt.c b/arch/x86/kernel/idt.c
index f445bec516a0..0bec4c7e2308 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/idt.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/idt.c
@@ -157,6 +157,7 @@ static const __initconst struct idt_data apic_idts[]
= {
INTG(POSTED_INTR_VECTOR, asm_sysvec_kvm_posted_intr_ipi),
INTG(POSTED_INTR_WAKEUP_VECTOR, asm_sysvec_kvm_posted_intr_wakeup_ipi),
INTG(POSTED_INTR_NESTED_VECTOR, asm_sysvec_kvm_posted_intr_nested_ipi),
+ INTG(KVM_GUEST_PMI_VECTOR, asm_sysvec_kvm_guest_pmi_handler),
There is a subtle inconsistency in that this code is guarded on
CONFIG_HAVE_KVM when the #define KVM_GUEST_PMI_VECTOR is guarded on
CONFIG_KVM. Beats me why there are two different flags that are so
similar, but it is possible they have different values leading to
compilation errors.
I happened to hit this compilation error because make defconfig will
define CONFIG_HAVE_KVM but not CONFIG_KVM. CONFIG_KVM is the more strict
of the two because it depends on CONFIG_HAVE_KVM.
This code should also be guarded on CONFIG_KVM.
# endif
# ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_WORK
INTG(IRQ_WORK_VECTOR, asm_sysvec_irq_work),
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
index 18cd418fe106..b29714e23fc4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
@@ -183,6 +183,12 @@ int arch_show_interrupts(struct seq_file *p, int
prec)
seq_printf(p, "%10u ",
irq_stats(j)->kvm_posted_intr_wakeup_ipis);
seq_puts(p, " Posted-interrupt wakeup event\n");
+
+ seq_printf(p, "%*s: ", prec, "VPMU");
+ for_each_online_cpu(j)
+ seq_printf(p, "%10u ",
+ irq_stats(j)->kvm_guest_pmis);
+ seq_puts(p, " KVM GUEST PMI\n");
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_POSTED_MSI
seq_printf(p, "%*s: ", prec, "PMN");
@@ -311,6 +317,7 @@ DEFINE_IDTENTRY_SYSVEC(sysvec_x86_platform_ipi)
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM)
static void dummy_handler(void) {}
static void (*kvm_posted_intr_wakeup_handler)(void) = dummy_handler;
+static void (*kvm_guest_pmi_handler)(void) = dummy_handler;
void x86_set_kvm_irq_handler(u8 vector, void (*handler)(void))
{
@@ -321,6 +328,10 @@ void x86_set_kvm_irq_handler(u8 vector, void
(*handler)(void))
(handler == dummy_handler ||
kvm_posted_intr_wakeup_handler == dummy_handler))
kvm_posted_intr_wakeup_handler = handler;
+ else if (vector == KVM_GUEST_PMI_VECTOR &&
+ (handler == dummy_handler ||
+ kvm_guest_pmi_handler == dummy_handler))
+ kvm_guest_pmi_handler = handler;
else
WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
@@ -356,6 +367,16 @@
DEFINE_IDTENTRY_SYSVEC_SIMPLE(sysvec_kvm_posted_intr_nested_ipi)
apic_eoi();
inc_irq_stat(kvm_posted_intr_nested_ipis);
}
+
+/*
+ * Handler for KVM_GUEST_PMI_VECTOR.
+ */
+DEFINE_IDTENTRY_SYSVEC(sysvec_kvm_guest_pmi_handler)
+{
+ apic_eoi();
+ inc_irq_stat(kvm_guest_pmis);
+ kvm_guest_pmi_handler();
+}
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_POSTED_MSI
diff --git a/tools/perf/trace/beauty/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h
b/tools/perf/trace/beauty/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h
index 13aea8fc3d45..670dcee46631 100644
--- a/tools/perf/trace/beauty/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h
+++ b/tools/perf/trace/beauty/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h
@@ -77,7 +77,10 @@
*/
#define IRQ_WORK_VECTOR 0xf6
-/* 0xf5 - unused, was UV_BAU_MESSAGE */
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM)
+#define KVM_GUEST_PMI_VECTOR 0xf5
+#endif
+
#define DEFERRED_ERROR_VECTOR 0xf4
/* Vector on which hypervisor callbacks will be delivered */
