Re: [PATCH 01/21] KVM: x86/mmu: Implement memslot deletion for TDX

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/21] KVM: x86/mmu: Implement memslot deletion for TDX
From: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2024 21:06:32 +0000
Accept-language: en-US
Cc: "Zhao, Yan Y" <yan.y.zhao@xxxxxxxxx>, "nik.borisov@xxxxxxxx" <nik.borisov@xxxxxxxx>, "dmatlack@xxxxxxxxxx" <dmatlack@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@xxxxxxxxx>, "isaku.yamahata@xxxxxxxxx" <isaku.yamahata@xxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <d4e07759-c9fc-49db-8b99-0b5798644fcc@redhat.com>
References: <20240904030751.117579-1-rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com> <20240904030751.117579-2-rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com> <d4e07759-c9fc-49db-8b99-0b5798644fcc@redhat.com>
User-agent: Evolution 3.44.4-0ubuntu2

On Mon, 2024-09-09 at 15:44 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> 
> Stale commit message, I guess.

Oof, yes. We can lose the KVM_X86_QUIRK_SLOT_ZAP_ALL discussion.

References:
- [PATCH 00/21] TDX MMU Part 2
  - From: Rick Edgecombe
- [PATCH 01/21] KVM: x86/mmu: Implement memslot deletion for TDX
  - From: Rick Edgecombe
- Re: [PATCH 01/21] KVM: x86/mmu: Implement memslot deletion for TDX
  - From: Paolo Bonzini

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 14/21] KVM: TDX: Implement hooks to propagate changes of TDP MMU mirror page table
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 03/21] KVM: x86/mmu: Do not enable page track for TD guest
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 01/21] KVM: x86/mmu: Implement memslot deletion for TDX
Next by thread: [PATCH 05/21] KVM: VMX: Teach EPT violation helper about private mem
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [KVM ARM] [KVM ia64] [KVM ppc] [Virtualization Tools] [Spice Development] [Libvirt] [Libvirt Users] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Questions] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [XFree86]

Powered by Linux