On 2024/8/21 20:48, Andrew Jones wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 09:23:54PM GMT, zhouquan@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Quan Zhou <zhouquan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Introduce basic guest support in perf, enabling it to distinguish
between PMU interrupts in the host or guest, and collect
fundamental information.
Signed-off-by: Quan Zhou <zhouquan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/riscv/include/asm/perf_event.h | 7 ++++++
arch/riscv/kernel/perf_callchain.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 45 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/perf_event.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/perf_event.h
index 665bbc9b2f84..c2b73c3aefe4 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/perf_event.h
@@ -8,13 +8,20 @@
#ifndef _ASM_RISCV_PERF_EVENT_H
#define _ASM_RISCV_PERF_EVENT_H
+#ifdef CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS
#include <linux/perf_event.h>
#define perf_arch_bpf_user_pt_regs(regs) (struct user_regs_struct *)regs
+extern unsigned long perf_instruction_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs);
+extern unsigned short perf_misc_flags(struct pt_regs *regs);
+#define perf_misc_flags(regs) perf_misc_flags(regs)
+
#define perf_arch_fetch_caller_regs(regs, __ip) { \
(regs)->epc = (__ip); \
(regs)->s0 = (unsigned long) __builtin_frame_address(0); \
(regs)->sp = current_stack_pointer; \
(regs)->status = SR_PP; \
}
+#endif
+
#endif /* _ASM_RISCV_PERF_EVENT_H */
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/perf_callchain.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/perf_callchain.c
index 3348a61de7d9..7af90a3bb373 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/perf_callchain.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/perf_callchain.c
@@ -58,6 +58,11 @@ void perf_callchain_user(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry,
{
unsigned long fp = 0;
+ if (perf_guest_state()) {
+ /* TODO: We don't support guest os callchain now */
+ return;
+ }
+
fp = regs->s0;
perf_callchain_store(entry, regs->epc);
@@ -74,5 +79,38 @@ static bool fill_callchain(void *entry, unsigned long pc)
void perf_callchain_kernel(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry,
struct pt_regs *regs)
{
+ if (perf_guest_state()) {
+ /* TODO: We don't support guest os callchain now */
+ return;
+ }
+
walk_stackframe(NULL, regs, fill_callchain, entry);
}
+
+unsigned long perf_instruction_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+ if (perf_guest_state())
+ return perf_guest_get_ip();
+
+ return instruction_pointer(regs);
+}
+
+unsigned short perf_misc_flags(struct pt_regs *regs)
I see that the consumer of perf_misc_flags is only a u16, but all other
architectures define this function as returning an unsigned long, and
your last version did as well. My comment in the last version was that
we should use an unsigned long for the 'misc' variable to match the
return type of the function. I still think we should do that instead
since the function should be consistent with the other architectures.
I agree with your point that the type of `misc` should be consistent
with other architectures.
However, one thing confuses me. The return value of perf_misc_flags
is assigned to the `misc` field of the perf_event_header structure,
and the field is defined as `u16`. I checked the return type of
`perf_misc_flags` in other architectures, and I found that for
x86/arm/s390, the type is `unsigned long`, while for powerpc, it is `u32`.
These do not match `u16`, which seems to pose a risk of type truncation
and feels a bit unconventional. Or is there some other reasonable
consideration behind this?
Thanks a lot!
Quan
+{
+ unsigned int guest_state = perf_guest_state();
+ unsigned short misc = 0;
+
+ if (guest_state) {
+ if (guest_state & PERF_GUEST_USER)
+ misc |= PERF_RECORD_MISC_GUEST_USER;
+ else
+ misc |= PERF_RECORD_MISC_GUEST_KERNEL;
+ } else {
+ if (user_mode(regs))
+ misc |= PERF_RECORD_MISC_USER;
+ else
+ misc |= PERF_RECORD_MISC_KERNEL;
+ }
+
+ return misc;
+}
--
2.34.1
Thanks,
drew
