On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 12:11:16AM +0000, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote: > On Wed, 2024-08-14 at 14:18 +0800, Binbin Wu wrote: > > > +#define KVM_TDX_CPUID_NO_SUBLEAF ((__u32)-1) > > > + > > > +struct kvm_tdx_cpuid_config { > > > + __u32 leaf; > > > + __u32 sub_leaf; > > > + __u32 eax; > > > + __u32 ebx; > > > + __u32 ecx; > > > + __u32 edx; > > > +}; > > > > I am wondering if there is any specific reason to define a new structure > > instead of using 'struct kvm_cpuid_entry2'? > > GOod question. I don't think so. I'll do a patch for this. Regards, Tony