Re: [PATCH v2] selftests: kvm: fix mkdir error when building for unsupported arch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 19 Aug 2024 23:15:44 +0100,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 09:33:17AM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > And other KVM maintainers, the big question is: if we do the above, would now be
> > a decent time to bite the bullet and switch to the kernel's canonical arch paths,
> > i.e. arm64, s390, and x86?  I feel like if we're ever going to get away from
> > using aarch64, x86_64, and s390x, this is as about a good of an opportunity as
> > we're going to get.
> 
> I'm pretty much indifferent on the matter, but I won't complain if you
> send out a change for this.

Same here. Call it arm64 or aargh64, same difference. Whatever we
change, some people will moan anyway.

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux