On Mon, 19 Aug 2024 23:15:44 +0100, Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 09:33:17AM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > And other KVM maintainers, the big question is: if we do the above, would now be > > a decent time to bite the bullet and switch to the kernel's canonical arch paths, > > i.e. arm64, s390, and x86? I feel like if we're ever going to get away from > > using aarch64, x86_64, and s390x, this is as about a good of an opportunity as > > we're going to get. > > I'm pretty much indifferent on the matter, but I won't complain if you > send out a change for this. Same here. Call it arm64 or aargh64, same difference. Whatever we change, some people will moan anyway. M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
