> -----Original Message----- > From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Friday, August 9, 2024 3:59 PM > To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: acpica-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Alex Williamson > <alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx>; Guohanjun (Hanjun Guo) > <guohanjun@xxxxxxxxxx>; iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Joerg Roedel > <joro@xxxxxxxxxx>; Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>; kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > Len Brown <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx>; linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm- > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Rafael J. > Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx>; Robert Moore <robert.moore@xxxxxxxxx>; Robin > Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>; Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx>; > Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>; Eric Auger <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx>; Jean- > Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@xxxxxxxxxx>; Moritz Fischer <mdf@xxxxxxxxxx>; > Michael Shavit <mshavit@xxxxxxxxxx>; Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@xxxxxxxxxx>; > patches@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] ACPI/IORT: Support CANWBS memory access flag > > On Fri, Aug 09, 2024 at 02:36:31PM +0000, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi wrote: > > > @@ -524,6 +524,7 @@ struct acpi_iort_memory_access { > > > > > > #define ACPI_IORT_MF_COHERENCY (1) > > > #define ACPI_IORT_MF_ATTRIBUTES (1<<1) > > > +#define ACPI_IORT_MF_CANWBS (1<<2) > > > > I think we need to update Document number to E.f in IORT section in > > this file. Also isn't it this file normally gets updated through ACPICA pull ? > > I don't know anything about the ACPI process.. > > Can someone say for sure what to do here?