[GIT PULL 1/2] KVM: s390: fix validity interception issue when gisa is switched off

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Michael Mueller <mimu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

We might run into a SIE validity if gisa has been disabled either via using
kernel parameter "kvm.use_gisa=0" or by setting the related sysfs
attribute to N (echo N >/sys/module/kvm/parameters/use_gisa).

The validity is caused by an invalid value in the SIE control block's
gisa designation. That happens because we pass the uninitialized gisa
origin to virt_to_phys() before writing it to the gisa designation.

To fix this we return 0 in kvm_s390_get_gisa_desc() if the origin is 0.
kvm_s390_get_gisa_desc() is used to determine which gisa designation to
set in the SIE control block. A value of 0 in the gisa designation disables
gisa usage.

The issue surfaces in the host kernel with the following kernel message as
soon a new kvm guest start is attemted.

kvm: unhandled validity intercept 0x1011
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 781237 at arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c:101 kvm_handle_sie_intercept+0x42e/0x4d0 [kvm]
Modules linked in: vhost_net tap tun xt_CHECKSUM xt_MASQUERADE xt_conntrack ipt_REJECT xt_tcpudp nft_compat x_tables nf_nat_tftp nf_conntrack_tftp vfio_pci_core irqbypass vhost_vsock vmw_vsock_virtio_transport_common vsock vhost vhost_iotlb kvm nft_fib_inet nft_fib_ipv4 nft_fib_ipv6 nft_fib nft_reject_inet nf_reject_ipv4 nf_reject_ipv6 nft_reject nft_ct nft_chain_nat nf_nat nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv4 ip_set nf_tables sunrpc mlx5_ib ib_uverbs ib_core mlx5_core uvdevice s390_trng eadm_sch vfio_ccw zcrypt_cex4 mdev vfio_iommu_type1 vfio sch_fq_codel drm i2c_core loop drm_panel_orientation_quirks configfs nfnetlink lcs ctcm fsm dm_service_time ghash_s390 prng chacha_s390 libchacha aes_s390 des_s390 libdes sha3_512_s390 sha3_256_s390 sha512_s390 sha256_s390 sha1_s390 sha_common dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log zfcp scsi_transport_fc scsi_dh_rdac scsi_dh_emc scsi_dh_alua pkey zcrypt dm_multipath rng_core autofs4 [last unloaded: vfio_pci]
CPU: 0 PID: 781237 Comm: CPU 0/KVM Not tainted 6.10.0-08682-gcad9f11498ea #6
Hardware name: IBM 3931 A01 701 (LPAR)
Krnl PSW : 0704c00180000000 000003d93deb0122 (kvm_handle_sie_intercept+0x432/0x4d0 [kvm])
           R:0 T:1 IO:1 EX:1 Key:0 M:1 W:0 P:0 AS:3 CC:0 PM:0 RI:0 EA:3
Krnl GPRS: 000003d900000027 000003d900000023 0000000000000028 000002cd00000000
           000002d063a00900 00000359c6daf708 00000000000bebb5 0000000000001eff
           000002cfd82e9000 000002cfd80bc000 0000000000001011 000003d93deda412
           000003ff8962df98 000003d93de77ce0 000003d93deb011e 00000359c6daf960
Krnl Code: 000003d93deb0112: c020fffe7259	larl	%r2,000003d93de7e5c4
           000003d93deb0118: c0e53fa8beac	brasl	%r14,000003d9bd3c7e70
          #000003d93deb011e: af000000		mc	0,0
          >000003d93deb0122: a728ffea		lhi	%r2,-22
           000003d93deb0126: a7f4fe24		brc	15,000003d93deafd6e
           000003d93deb012a: 9101f0b0		tm	176(%r15),1
           000003d93deb012e: a774fe48		brc	7,000003d93deafdbe
           000003d93deb0132: 40a0f0ae		sth	%r10,174(%r15)
Call Trace:
 [<000003d93deb0122>] kvm_handle_sie_intercept+0x432/0x4d0 [kvm]
([<000003d93deb011e>] kvm_handle_sie_intercept+0x42e/0x4d0 [kvm])
 [<000003d93deacc10>] vcpu_post_run+0x1d0/0x3b0 [kvm]
 [<000003d93deaceda>] __vcpu_run+0xea/0x2d0 [kvm]
 [<000003d93dead9da>] kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x16a/0x430 [kvm]
 [<000003d93de93ee0>] kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x190/0x7c0 [kvm]
 [<000003d9bd728b4e>] vfs_ioctl+0x2e/0x70
 [<000003d9bd72a092>] __s390x_sys_ioctl+0xc2/0xd0
 [<000003d9be0e9222>] __do_syscall+0x1f2/0x2e0
 [<000003d9be0f9a90>] system_call+0x70/0x98
Last Breaking-Event-Address:
 [<000003d9bd3c7f58>] __warn_printk+0xe8/0xf0

Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reported-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: fe0ef0030463 ("KVM: s390: sort out physical vs virtual pointers usage")
Signed-off-by: Michael Mueller <mimu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240801123109.2782155-1-mimu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Message-ID: <20240801123109.2782155-1-mimu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h | 7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h
index bf8534218af3..e680c6bf0c9d 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h
@@ -267,7 +267,12 @@ static inline unsigned long kvm_s390_get_gfn_end(struct kvm_memslots *slots)
 
 static inline u32 kvm_s390_get_gisa_desc(struct kvm *kvm)
 {
-	u32 gd = virt_to_phys(kvm->arch.gisa_int.origin);
+	u32 gd;
+
+	if (!kvm->arch.gisa_int.origin)
+		return 0;
+
+	gd = virt_to_phys(kvm->arch.gisa_int.origin);
 
 	if (gd && sclp.has_gisaf)
 		gd |= GISA_FORMAT1;
-- 
2.46.0





[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux