On Fri, Aug 02, 2024 at 01:49:59PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Add a proper lockdep assertion in __kvm_set_memory_region() instead of
> relying on a function comment. Opportunistically delete the entire
> function comment as the API doesn't allocate memory or select a gfn,
> and the "mostly for framebuffers" comment hasn't been true for a very long
> time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 10 ++--------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> index 0557d663b69b..f202bdbfca9e 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -1973,14 +1973,6 @@ static bool kvm_check_memslot_overlap(struct kvm_memslots *slots, int id,
> return false;
> }
>
> -/*
> - * Allocate some memory and give it an address in the guest physical address
> - * space.
> - *
> - * Discontiguous memory is allowed, mostly for framebuffers.
> - *
> - * Must be called holding kvm->slots_lock for write.
> - */
> int __kvm_set_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm,
> const struct kvm_userspace_memory_region2 *mem)
> {
> @@ -1992,6 +1984,8 @@ int __kvm_set_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm,
> int as_id, id;
> int r;
>
> + lockdep_assert_held(&kvm->slots_lock);
How about adding this lockdep assertion in __x86_set_memory_region() to replace
this comment "/* Called with kvm->slots_lock held. */" as well?
> +
> r = check_memory_region_flags(kvm, mem);
> if (r)
> return r;
> --
> 2.46.0.rc2.264.g509ed76dc8-goog
>
>
