On Thu, 25 Jul 2024 14:03:12 +0200 Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 7/23/24 11:31, Christoph Schlameuss wrote: > > Add test case running code interacting with registers within a > > ucontrol VM. > > > > * Add uc_gprs test case > > > > The test uses the same VM setup using the fixture and debug macros > > introduced in earlier patches in this series. > > > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Schlameuss <schlameuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > .../selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c | 132 ++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 132 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c > > index 527c431a9758..c98d5a3a315b 100644 > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c > > @@ -43,6 +43,23 @@ void require_ucontrol_admin(void) > > TEST_REQUIRE(kvm_has_cap(KVM_CAP_S390_UCONTROL)); > > } > > > > +/* Test program setting some registers and looping */ > > +extern char test_gprs_pgm[]; > > +asm("test_gprs_pgm:\n" > > + "xgr %r0, %r0\n" > > + "lgfi %r1,1\n" > [...] > > Naming something PGM for handling anything else than Program Exceptions > is not recommendable. PGM has been a stable name on s390 for code > related to PGM exceptions > > When first reading this I expected to find some kind of exception code. > Ok, I get it now. Previously I was thinking only "test_pgm" was the hangup. But I do understand now. I will rename these here and in the other patches to "test_xxx_asm" to hopefully reduce the confusion. Christoph