Hi guys,
This is another try to allow userspace to change ID_AA64PFR1_EL1, and we want to
give userspace the ability to control the visible feature set for a VM, which
could be used by userspace in such a way to transparently migrate VMs.
The patch series have four part:
The first patch disable those fields which KVM doesn't know how to handle, so
KVM will only expose value 0 of those fields to the guest.
The second patch check the FEAT_SSBS in guest IDREG instead of the cpu
capability.
The third patch allow userspace to change ID_AA64PFR1_EL1, it only advertise the
fields known to KVM and leave others unadvertise.
The fourth patch adds the kselftest to test if userspace can change the
ID_AA64PFR1_EL1.
Besides, I also noticed there is another patch [1] which try to make the
ID_AA64PFR1_EL1 writable. This patch [1] is try to enable GCS on baremental, and
add GCS support for the guest. What I understand is if we have GCS support on
baremental, it will be clear to how to handle them in KVM. And same for other
fields like NMI, THE, DF2, MTEX.. At that time, they can be writable.
[1] [PATCH v9 13/39] KVM: arm64: Manage GCS registers for guests
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240625-arm64-gcs-v9-13-0f634469b8f0@xxxxxxxxxx/
Changelog:
----------
v4 -> v5:
* Only advertise fields which KVM know how to handle to userspace, leave
others unadvertised.
* Add a new patch to check FEAT_SSBS in IDREG instead of cpu capability.
* Tweak the kselftest writable fields.
* Improve the commit message.
v3 -> v4:
* Add a new patch to disable some feature which KVM doesn't know how to
handle in the register accessor.
* Handle all the fields in the register.
* Fixes a small cnt issue in kselftest.
v2 -> v3:
* Give more description about why only part of the fields can be writable.
* Updated the writable mask by referring the latest ARM spec.
v1 -> v2:
* Tackling the full register instead of single field.
* Changing the patch title and commit message.
RFCv1 -> v1:
* Fix the compilation error.
* Delete the machine specific information and make the description more
generable.
RFCv1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240612023553.127813-1-shahuang@xxxxxxxxxx/
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240617075131.1006173-1-shahuang@xxxxxxxxxx/
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240618063808.1040085-1-shahuang@xxxxxxxxxx/
v3: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240628060454.1936886-2-shahuang@xxxxxxxxxx/
v4: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240718035017.434996-1-shahuang@xxxxxxxxxx/
Shaoqin Huang (4):
KVM: arm64: Disable fields that KVM doesn't know how to handle in
ID_AA64PFR1_EL1
KVM: arm64: Use kvm_has_feat() to check if FEAT_SSBS is advertised to
the guest
KVM: arm64: Allow userspace to change ID_AA64PFR1_EL1
KVM: selftests: aarch64: Add writable test for ID_AA64PFR1_EL1
arch/arm64/kvm/hypercalls.c | 12 +++++-----
arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++-
.../selftests/kvm/aarch64/set_id_regs.c | 14 +++++++++---
3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
--
2.40.1
