Re: [GIT PULL (sort of)] KVM: x86: Static call changes for 6.11

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/16/24 17:46, Sean Christopherson wrote:
No, I think you misread the #if-#elif-#else.  It's only the !HAVE_STATIC_CALL
case that requires use of static_call_cond().

Oh, of course - the "select HAVE_STATIC_CALL" is right above the "select HAVE_STATIC_CALL_INLINE if HAVE_OBJTOOL" line. I was definitely overthinking it.

Paolo





[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux