Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Add GPA limit check to kvm_arch_vcpu_pre_fault_memory()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 01:17:27PM -0700,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 15, 2024, isaku.yamahata@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > From: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@xxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Add GPA limit check to kvm_arch_vcpu_pre_fault_memory() with guest
> > maxphyaddr and kvm_mmu_max_gfn().
> > 
> > The KVM page fault handler decides which level of TDP to use, 4-level TDP
> > or 5-level TDP based on guest maxphyaddr (CPUID[0x80000008].EAX[7:0]), the
> > host maxphyaddr, and whether the host supports 5-level TDP or not.  The
> > 4-level TDP can map GPA up to 48 bits, and the 5-level TDP can map GPA up
> > to 52 bits.  If guest maxphyaddr <= 48, KVM uses 4-level TDP even when the
> > host supports 5-level TDP.
> > 
> > If we pass GPA > beyond the TDP mappable limit to the TDP MMU fault handler
> > (concretely GPA > 48-bits with 4-level TDP), it will operate on GPA without
> > upper bits, (GPA & ((1UL < 48) - 1)), not the specified GPA.  It is not
> > expected behavior.  It wrongly maps GPA without upper bits with the page
> > for GPA with upper bits.
> > 
> > KVM_PRE_FAULT_MEMORY calls x86 KVM page fault handler, kvm_tdp_page_fault()
> > with a user-space-supplied GPA without the limit check so that the user
> > space can trigger WARN_ON_ONCE().  Check the GPA limit to fix it.
> 
> Which WARN?

Sorry, I confused with the local changes for 4/5-level.


> 
> > - For non-TDX case (DEFAULT_VM, SW_PROTECTED_VM, or SEV):
> >   When the host supports 5-level TDP, KVM decides to use 4-level TDP if
> >   cpuid_maxphyaddr() <= 48.  cpuid_maxhyaddr() check prevents
> >   KVM_PRE_FAULT_MEMORY from passing GFN beyond mappable GFN.
> 
> Hardening against cpuid_maxphyaddr() should be out of scope.  We don't enforce
> it for guest faults, e.g. KVM doesn't kill the guest if allow_smaller_maxphyaddr
> is false and the GPA is supposed to be illegal.  And trying to enforce it here is
> a fool's errand since userspace can simply do KVM_SET_CPUID2 to circumvent the
> restriction.

Ok, I'll drop maxphys addr check.


> > - For TDX case:
> >   We'd like to exclude shared bit (or gfn_direct_mask in [1]) from GPA
> >   passed to the TDP MMU so that the TDP MMU can handle Secure-EPT or
> >   Shared-EPT (direct or mirrored in [1]) without explicitly
> >   setting/clearing the GPA (except setting up the TDP iterator,
> >   tdp_iter_refresh_sptep()).  We'd like to make kvm_mmu_max_gfn() per VM
> >   for TDX to be 52 or 47 independent of the guest maxphyaddr with other
> >   patches.
> > 
> > Fixes: 6e01b7601dfe ("KVM: x86: Implement kvm_arch_vcpu_pre_fault_memory()")
> > Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 5 +++++
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> > index 4e0e9963066f..6ee5af55cee1 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> > @@ -4756,6 +4756,11 @@ long kvm_arch_vcpu_pre_fault_memory(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> >  	u64 end;
> >  	int r;
> >  
> > +	if (range->gpa >= (1UL << cpuid_maxphyaddr(vcpu)))
> > +		return -E2BIG;
> > +	if (gpa_to_gfn(range->gpa) > kvm_mmu_max_gfn())
> > +		return -E2BIG;
> 
> 
> Related to my thoughts on making kvm_mmu_max_gfn() and rejecting aliased memslots,
> I think we should add a common helper that's used by kvm_arch_prepare_memory_region()
> and kvm_arch_vcpu_pre_fault_memory() to reject GPAs that are disallowed.
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZpbKqG_ZhCWxl-Fc@xxxxxxxxxx

I'll look into it. I'll combine two patches into single patch series.
-- 
Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@xxxxxxxxx>




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux