Re: [PATCH 0/5] KVM: arm64: Fix handling of TCR2_EL1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 25 Jun 2024 14:00:36 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> As I'm inching towards supporting FEAT_S1PIE in a NV guest (oh, the
> fun I'm having!), it has become obvious that we're missing the basics
> when it comes to:
> 
> - VM configuration: HCRX_EL2.TCR2En is forced to 1, and we blindly
>   save/restore stuff.
> 
> [...]

Applied to kvmarm/next, thanks!

[1/5] KVM: arm64: Correctly honor the presence of FEAT_TCRX
      https://git.kernel.org/kvmarm/kvmarm/c/9b58e665d6b2
[2/5] KVM: arm64: Get rid of HCRX_GUEST_FLAGS
      https://git.kernel.org/kvmarm/kvmarm/c/a3ee9ce88ba3
[3/5] KVM: arm64: Make TCR2_EL1 save/restore dependent on the VM features
      https://git.kernel.org/kvmarm/kvmarm/c/1b04fd40275e
[4/5] KVM: arm64: Make PIR{,E0}_EL1 save/restore conditional on FEAT_TCRX
      https://git.kernel.org/kvmarm/kvmarm/c/663abf04ee4d
[5/5] KVM: arm64: Honor trap routing for TCR2_EL1
      https://git.kernel.org/kvmarm/kvmarm/c/91e9cc70b775

--
Best,
Oliver




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux