Re: [PATCH 1/1] KVM: s390: fix LPSWEY handling

Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] KVM: s390: fix LPSWEY handling
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 18:55:05 +0200
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, KVM <kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-s390 <linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Huth <thuth@xxxxxxxxxx>, Vasily Gorbik <gor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Marc Hartmayer <mhartmay@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sven Schnelle <svens@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20240628172259.1e172f35@p-imbrenda.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
References: <20240627090520.4667-1-borntraeger@linux.ibm.com> <20240627095720.8660-D-hca@linux.ibm.com> <23e861e2-d184-4367-acc9-3e72c48c3282@linux.ibm.com> <20240628172259.1e172f35@p-imbrenda.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird



Am 28.06.24 um 17:22 schrieb Claudio Imbrenda:
[...]

disp1 = sign_extend64(disp1, 20);


[...]

Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>


I dropped this RB since I did use 19 instead of 20 for sign_extend64

References:
- [PATCH 1/1] KVM: s390: fix LPSWEY handling
  - From: Christian Borntraeger
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] KVM: s390: fix LPSWEY handling
  - From: Heiko Carstens
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] KVM: s390: fix LPSWEY handling
  - From: Christian Borntraeger
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] KVM: s390: fix LPSWEY handling
  - From: Claudio Imbrenda