On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 19:16:05 +0200
Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-06-20 at 18:55 +0200, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 16:16:58 +0200
> > Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > It is useful to be able to force an exit to the host from the snippet,
> > > as well as do so while returning a value.
> > > Add this functionality, also add helper functions for the host to check
> > > for an exit and get or check the value.
> > > Use diag 0x44 and 0x9c for this.
> > > Add a guest specific snippet header file and rename snippet.h to reflect
> > > that it is host specific.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >
> > > +static inline void diag44(void)
> > > +{
> > > + asm volatile("diag 0,0,0x44\n");
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static inline void diag9c(uint64_t val)
> > > +{
> > > + asm volatile("diag %[val],0,0x9c\n"
> > > + :
> > > + : [val] "d"(val)
> > > + );
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > #endif
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > +static inline void force_exit(void)
> > > +{
> > > + diag44();
> > > + mb(); /* allow host to modify guest memory */
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static inline void force_exit_value(uint64_t val)
> > > +{
> > > + diag9c(val);
> > > + mb(); /* allow host to modify guest memory */
> > > +}
> >
> > why not adding "memory" to the clobbers of the inline asm? (not a big
> > deal, I'm just curious if there is a specific reason for an explicit
> > mb())
>
> Mostly a matter of taste I guess.
> The diag functions are just convenience wrappers, doing nothing but
> executing the diag.
> force_exit is a protocol between the host and guest that uses the diags
> and adds additional semantics on top.
> In theory you could have other use cases where the diags are just a timeslice yield.
fair enough
Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >
> > [...]
>
