On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 05:14:24 -0400, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 05:00:49PM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote:
> > > > @@ -226,21 +248,37 @@ struct virtqueue *virtio_find_single_vq(struct virtio_device *vdev,
> > > >
> > > > static inline
> > > > int virtio_find_vqs(struct virtio_device *vdev, unsigned nvqs,
> > > > - struct virtqueue *vqs[], vq_callback_t *callbacks[],
> > > > - const char * const names[],
> > > > - struct irq_affinity *desc)
> > > > + struct virtqueue *vqs[], vq_callback_t *callbacks[],
> > > > + const char * const names[],
> > > > + struct irq_affinity *desc)
> > > > {
> > > > - return vdev->config->find_vqs(vdev, nvqs, vqs, callbacks, names, NULL, desc);
> > > > + struct virtio_vq_config cfg = {};
> > > > +
> > > > + cfg.nvqs = nvqs;
> > > > + cfg.vqs = vqs;
> > > > + cfg.callbacks = callbacks;
> > > > + cfg.names = (const char **)names;
> > >
> > >
> > > Casting const away? Not safe.
> >
> >
> >
> > Because the vp_modern_create_avq() use the "const char *names[]",
> > and the virtio_uml.c changes the name in the subsequent commit, so
> > change the "names" inside the virtio_vq_config from "const char *const
> > *names" to "const char **names".
>
> I'm not sure I understand which commit you mean,
> and this kind of change needs to be documented, but it does not matter.
> Don't cast away const.
Do you mean change the virtio_find_vqs(), from
const char * const names[] to const char *names[].
And update the caller?
If we do not cast the const, we need to update all the caller to remove the
const.
Right?
Thanks.
>
> --
> MST
>
