> -----Original Message----- > From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Thursday, June 6, 2024 7:21 AM > To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>; Paolo Bonzini > <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Like Xu <like.xu.linux@xxxxxxxxx>; Mingwei Zhang > <mizhang@xxxxxxxxxx>; Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Zhang, > Xiong Y <xiong.y.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>; Lv, Zhiyuan <zhiyuan.lv@xxxxxxxxx>; Mi, > Dapeng1 <dapeng1.mi@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/4] x86/pmu: PEBS fixes and new testcases > > On Wed, 06 Mar 2024 15:01:49 -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > One bug fix where pmu_pebs attempts to enable PEBS for fixed counter > > on CPUs without Extended PEBS, and two new testcases to verify > > adaptive PEBS functionality. > > > > The new testcases are intended both to demonstrate that adaptive PEBS > > virtualization is currently broken, and to serve as a gatekeeper for > > re-enabling adapative PEBS in the future. > > > > [...] > > Applied to kvm-x86 next. Dapeng, I didn't address your feedback about adding > finer grained message prefixes. I'm not opposed to doing so, I'm just extremely > short on cycles and want to get the fixes landed. It's fine. I think I can help to add it. 😊 > > [1/4] x86/pmu: Enable PEBS on fixed counters iff baseline PEBS is support > https://github.com/kvm-x86/kvm-unit-tests/commit/79aa106cd427 > [2/4] x86/pmu: Iterate over adaptive PEBS flag combinations > https://github.com/kvm-x86/kvm-unit-tests/commit/fc17d5276b38 > [3/4] x86/pmu: Test adaptive PEBS without any adaptive counters > https://github.com/kvm-x86/kvm-unit-tests/commit/2cb2af7f53db > [4/4] x86/pmu: Add a PEBS test to verify the host LBRs aren't leaked to the guest > https://github.com/kvm-x86/kvm-unit-tests/commit/8d0f574f4e4d > > -- > https://github.com/kvm-x86/kvm-unit-tests/tree/next
