On Tue, May 07, 2024, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 05:30:03AM +0000, Mingwei Zhang wrote:
> > From: Xiong Zhang <xiong.y.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > perf subsystem should stop and restart all the perf events at the host
> > level when entering and leaving passthrough PMU respectively. So invoke
> > the perf API at PMU context switch functions.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Xiong Zhang <xiong.y.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/events/core.c | 4 ++++
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c
> > index f5a043410614..6fe467bca809 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
> > @@ -705,6 +705,8 @@ void x86_perf_guest_enter(u32 guest_lvtpc)
> > {
> > lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
> >
> > + perf_guest_enter();
> > +
> > apic_write(APIC_LVTPC, APIC_DM_FIXED | KVM_GUEST_PMI_VECTOR |
> > (guest_lvtpc & APIC_LVT_MASKED));
> > }
> > @@ -715,6 +717,8 @@ void x86_perf_guest_exit(void)
> > lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
> >
> > apic_write(APIC_LVTPC, APIC_DM_NMI);
> > +
> > + perf_guest_exit();
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(x86_perf_guest_exit);
>
> *sigh*.. why does this patch exist? Please merge with the one that
> introduces these functions.
>
> This is making review really hard.
Ah, right. This function should be added immediately after commit "perf:
x86: Add x86 function to switch PMI handler". It was just mind set of
development: "how can we call perf_guest_{enter,exit}() if KVM has not
implemented anything?" So we defer the invocation until this moment :)
Will fix that in next version.
Thanks.
-Mingwei
