* Brian Jackson (iggy@xxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > On Tuesday 18 May 2010 08:52:36 Anthony Liguori wrote: > > On 05/18/2010 01:59 AM, Brian Jackson wrote: > > > On Monday 17 May 2010 22:23:46 Chris Wright wrote: > > >> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. > > >> > > >> If we have a lack of agenda items I'll cancel the week's call. > > > > > > Perceived long standing bugs that nobody seems to care about. There are a > > > few, one of which is the> 1TB [1] bug that has existed for 4+ months. > > > > s/care about/know about/g > > > > This should be filed in launchpad as a qemu bug and it should be tested > > against the latest git. This bug sounds like we're using an int to > > represent sector offset somewhere but there's not enough info in the bug > > report to figure out for sure. I just audited the virtio-blk -> raw -> > > aio=threads path and I don't see an obvious place that we're getting it > > wrong. > > > > > And others. > > > > Bugs that affect qemu should be filed in launchpad. Launchpad has nice > > features like the able to mark bugs as affecting many users which help > > raise visibility. I can't speak for the source forge tracker, but I do > > regular triage on launchpad for qemu bugs. > > > I wonder how everyone would feel about closing the kvm tracker to new > submissions and move everything over to launchpad? Yeah, this was suggested on the call today. Anthony's sending out an email proposal on better bug tracking thanks, -chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
