From: Quan Zhou <zhouquan@xxxxxxxxxxx> In the function kvm_riscv_vcpu_set_reg_isa_ext, the original code used incorrect reg_subtype labels KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_MULTI_EN/DIS. These have been corrected to KVM_REG_RISCV_ISA_MULTI_EN/DIS respectively. Although they are numerically equivalent, the actual processing will not result in errors, but it may lead to ambiguous code semantics. Signed-off-by: Quan Zhou <zhouquan@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_onereg.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_onereg.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_onereg.c index c676275ea0a0..62874fbca29f 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_onereg.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_onereg.c @@ -724,9 +724,9 @@ static int kvm_riscv_vcpu_set_reg_isa_ext(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, switch (reg_subtype) { case KVM_REG_RISCV_ISA_SINGLE: return riscv_vcpu_set_isa_ext_single(vcpu, reg_num, reg_val); - case KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_MULTI_EN: + case KVM_REG_RISCV_ISA_MULTI_EN: return riscv_vcpu_set_isa_ext_multi(vcpu, reg_num, reg_val, true); - case KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_MULTI_DIS: + case KVM_REG_RISCV_ISA_MULTI_DIS: return riscv_vcpu_set_isa_ext_multi(vcpu, reg_num, reg_val, false); default: return -ENOENT; base-commit: 29c73fc794c83505066ee6db893b2a83ac5fac63 -- 2.34.1