From: Quan Zhou <zhouquan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In the function kvm_riscv_vcpu_set_reg_isa_ext, the original code
used incorrect reg_subtype labels KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_MULTI_EN/DIS.
These have been corrected to KVM_REG_RISCV_ISA_MULTI_EN/DIS respectively.
Although they are numerically equivalent, the actual processing
will not result in errors, but it may lead to ambiguous code semantics.
Signed-off-by: Quan Zhou <zhouquan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_onereg.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_onereg.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_onereg.c
index c676275ea0a0..62874fbca29f 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_onereg.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_onereg.c
@@ -724,9 +724,9 @@ static int kvm_riscv_vcpu_set_reg_isa_ext(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
switch (reg_subtype) {
case KVM_REG_RISCV_ISA_SINGLE:
return riscv_vcpu_set_isa_ext_single(vcpu, reg_num, reg_val);
- case KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_MULTI_EN:
+ case KVM_REG_RISCV_ISA_MULTI_EN:
return riscv_vcpu_set_isa_ext_multi(vcpu, reg_num, reg_val, true);
- case KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_MULTI_DIS:
+ case KVM_REG_RISCV_ISA_MULTI_DIS:
return riscv_vcpu_set_isa_ext_multi(vcpu, reg_num, reg_val, false);
default:
return -ENOENT;
base-commit: 29c73fc794c83505066ee6db893b2a83ac5fac63
--
2.34.1
