On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 11:50:58PM +0000, "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 2024-05-22 at 16:47 -0700, Isaku Yamahata wrote: > > > How about we leave option 1 as a separate patch and note it is not > > > functionally > > > required? Then we can shed it if needed. At the least it can serve as a > > > conversation piece in the meantime. > > > > Ok. We understand the situation correctly. I think it's okay to do nothing for > > now with some notes somewhere as record because it doesn't affect much for > > usual > > case. > > I meant we include your proposed option 1 as a separate patch in the next > series. I'm writing am currently writing a log for the iterator changes, and > I'll note it as an issue. And then we include this later in the same series. No? Ok, Let's include the patch. -- Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@xxxxxxxxx>
