Re: [PATCH v3] target/i386: Fix CPUID encoding of Fn8000001E_ECX

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Daniel,

On 5/10/2024 3:10 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 11:05:44AM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
09.05.2024 17:11, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 04:54:16PM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
03.05.2024 20:46, Babu Moger wrote:

diff --git a/hw/i386/pc.c b/hw/i386/pc.c
index 08c7de416f..46235466d7 100644
--- a/hw/i386/pc.c
+++ b/hw/i386/pc.c
@@ -81,6 +81,7 @@
    GlobalProperty pc_compat_9_0[] = {
        { TYPE_X86_CPU, "guest-phys-bits", "0" },
        { "sev-guest", "legacy-vm-type", "true" },
+    { TYPE_X86_CPU, "legacy-multi-node", "on" },
    };

Should this legacy-multi-node property be added to previous
machine types when applying to stable?  How about stable-8.2
and stable-7.2?

machine types are considered to express a fixed guest ABI
once part of a QEMU release. Given that we should not be
changing existing machine types in stable branches.

Yes, I understand this, and this is exactly why I asked.
The change in question has been Cc'ed to stable.  And I'm
trying to understand what should I do with it :)

In theory we could create new "bug fix" machine types in stable
branches. To support live migration, we would then need to also
add those same stable branch "bug fix" machine type versions in
all future QEMU versions. This is generally not worth the hassle
of exploding the number of machine types.

If you backport the patch, minus the machine type, then users
can still get the fix but they'll need to manually set the
property to enable it.

I don't think this makes big sense.  But maybe for someone who
actually hits this issue such backport will let to fix it.
Hence, again, I'm asking if it really a good idea to pick this
up for stable (any version of, - currently there are 2 active
series, 7.2, 8.2 and 9.0).

Hmm, the description says

   "Observed the following failure while booting the SEV-SNP guest"

and yet the patches for SEV-SNP are *not* merged in QEMU yet. So this
does not look relevant for stable unless I'm missing something.

I have not thought thru about stable tag. This is not critical for stable release.

If required I will send a separate patch for stable later. It is not required right now. Sorry about the noise.

--
- Babu Moger




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux