On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 05:29:37AM +0000, Mingwei Zhang wrote:
> From: Xiong Zhang <xiong.y.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Add x86 specific function to switch PMI handler since passthrough PMU and host
> PMU use different interrupt vectors.
>
> x86_perf_guest_enter() switch PMU vector from NMI to KVM_GUEST_PMI_VECTOR,
> and guest LVTPC_MASK value should be reflected onto HW to indicate whether
> guest has cleared LVTPC_MASK or not, so guest lvt_pc is passed as parameter.
>
> x86_perf_guest_exit() switch PMU vector from KVM_GUEST_PMI_VECTOR to NMI.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiong Zhang <xiong.y.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/x86/events/core.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c
> index 09050641ce5d..8167f2230d3a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
> @@ -701,6 +701,23 @@ struct perf_guest_switch_msr *perf_guest_get_msrs(int *nr, void *data)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(perf_guest_get_msrs);
>
> +void x86_perf_guest_enter(u32 guest_lvtpc)
> +{
> + lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
> +
> + apic_write(APIC_LVTPC, APIC_DM_FIXED | KVM_GUEST_PMI_VECTOR |
> + (guest_lvtpc & APIC_LVT_MASKED));
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(x86_perf_guest_enter);
> +
> +void x86_perf_guest_exit(void)
> +{
> + lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
> +
> + apic_write(APIC_LVTPC, APIC_DM_NMI);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(x86_perf_guest_exit);
Urgghh... because it makes sense for this bare APIC write to be exported
?!?
Can't this at the very least be hard tied to perf_guest_{enter,exit}() ?
