Re: [PATCH v10 22/27] KVM: VMX: Set up interception for CET MSRs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/2/2024 7:07 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
On Sun, Feb 18, 2024, Yang Weijiang wrote:
@@ -7767,6 +7771,41 @@ static void update_intel_pt_cfg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
  		vmx->pt_desc.ctl_bitmask &= ~(0xfULL << (32 + i * 4));
  }
+static void vmx_update_intercept_for_cet_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	bool incpt;
+
+	if (kvm_cpu_cap_has(X86_FEATURE_SHSTK)) {
+		incpt = !guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_SHSTK);
+
+		vmx_set_intercept_for_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_U_CET,
+					  MSR_TYPE_RW, incpt);
+		vmx_set_intercept_for_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_S_CET,
+					  MSR_TYPE_RW, incpt);
+		vmx_set_intercept_for_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_PL0_SSP,
+					  MSR_TYPE_RW, incpt);
+		vmx_set_intercept_for_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_PL1_SSP,
+					  MSR_TYPE_RW, incpt);
+		vmx_set_intercept_for_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_PL2_SSP,
+					  MSR_TYPE_RW, incpt);
+		vmx_set_intercept_for_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_PL3_SSP,
+					  MSR_TYPE_RW, incpt);
+		vmx_set_intercept_for_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_INT_SSP_TAB,
+					  MSR_TYPE_RW, incpt);
+		if (!incpt)
+			return;
Hmm, I find this is unnecessarily confusing and brittle.  E.g. in the unlikely
event more CET stuff comes along, this lurking return could cause problems.

Why not handle S_CET and U_CET in a single common path?  IMO, this is less error
prone, and more clearly captures the relationship between S/U_CET, SHSTK, and IBT.
Updating MSR intercepts is not a hot path, so the overhead of checking guest CPUID
multiple times should be a non-issue.  And eventually KVM should effectively cache
all of those lookups, i.e. the cost will be negilible.

	bool incpt;

	if (kvm_cpu_cap_has(X86_FEATURE_SHSTK)) {
		incpt = !guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_SHSTK);

		vmx_set_intercept_for_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_PL0_SSP,
					  MSR_TYPE_RW, incpt);
		vmx_set_intercept_for_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_PL1_SSP,
					  MSR_TYPE_RW, incpt);
		vmx_set_intercept_for_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_PL2_SSP,
					  MSR_TYPE_RW, incpt);
		vmx_set_intercept_for_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_PL3_SSP,
					  MSR_TYPE_RW, incpt);
		vmx_set_intercept_for_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_INT_SSP_TAB,
					  MSR_TYPE_RW, incpt);
	}

	if (kvm_cpu_cap_has(X86_FEATURE_SHSTK) ||
	    kvm_cpu_cap_has(X86_FEATURE_IBT)) {
		incpt = !guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_IBT) &&
			!guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_SHSTK);

		vmx_set_intercept_for_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_U_CET,
					  MSR_TYPE_RW, incpt);
		vmx_set_intercept_for_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_S_CET,
					  MSR_TYPE_RW, incpt);
	}

It looks fine to me, will apply it, thanks!






[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux