On 05/14/2010 06:16 AM, Sheng Yang wrote:
Convert KVM to use generic FPU API.
Signed-off-by: Sheng Yang<sheng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 18 +---------
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 73 ++++++++++++---------------------------
2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index ed48904..beba6f5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -300,8 +300,7 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
unsigned long mmu_seq;
} update_pte;
- struct i387_fxsave_struct host_fx_image;
- struct i387_fxsave_struct guest_fx_image;
+ struct fpu host_fpu, guest_fpu;
Do we really need host_fpu? I think we can call unlazy_fpu() instead
and drop host_fpu completely. This might reduce the need for changes in
patch 1 (as well as generally improving the code).
--
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
