Re: [PATCH v10 09/27] KVM: x86: Rename kvm_{g,s}et_msr()* to menifest emulation operations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



s/menifest/manifest, though I find the shortlog confusing irrespective of the
typo.  I think this would be more grammatically correct:

  KVM: x86: Rename kvm_{g,s}et_msr()* to manifest their emulation operations

but I still find that unnecessarily "fancy".  What about this instead?

  KVM: x86: Rename kvm_{g,s}et_msr()* to show that they emulate guest accesses

It's not perfect, e.g. it might be read as saying they emulate guest RDMSR and
WRMSR, but for a shortlog I think that's fine.




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux