On 4/23/2024 11:18 PM, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
On 4/19/2024 4:59 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
...
+static void __test_pre_fault_memory(unsigned long vm_type, bool private)
+{
+ const struct vm_shape shape = {
+ .mode = VM_MODE_DEFAULT,
+ .type = vm_type,
+ };
+ struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
+ struct kvm_run *run;
+ struct kvm_vm *vm;
+ struct ucall uc;
+
+ uint64_t guest_test_phys_mem;
+ uint64_t guest_test_virt_mem;
+ uint64_t alignment, guest_page_size;
+
+ vm = vm_create_shape_with_one_vcpu(shape, &vcpu, guest_code);
+
+ alignment = guest_page_size =
vm_guest_mode_params[VM_MODE_DEFAULT].page_size;
+ guest_test_phys_mem = (vm->max_gfn - TEST_NPAGES) * guest_page_size;
+#ifdef __s390x__
+ alignment = max(0x100000UL, guest_page_size);
+#else
+ alignment = SZ_2M;
+#endif
+ guest_test_phys_mem = align_down(guest_test_phys_mem, alignment);
+ guest_test_virt_mem = guest_test_phys_mem;
guest_test_virt_mem cannot be assigned as guest_test_phys_mem, which
leads to following virt_map() fails with
The root cause is that vm->pa_bits is 52 while vm->va_bits is 48. So
vm->max_gfn is beyond the capability of va space
==== Test Assertion Failure ====
lib/x86_64/processor.c:197: sparsebit_is_set(vm->vpages_valid, (vaddr
>> vm->page_shift))
pid=4773 tid=4773 errno=0 - Success
1 0x000000000040f55c: __virt_pg_map at processor.c:197
2 0x000000000040605e: virt_pg_map at kvm_util_base.h:1065
3 (inlined by) virt_map at kvm_util.c:1571
4 0x0000000000402b75: __test_pre_fault_memory at
pre_fault_memory_test.c:96
5 0x000000000040246e: test_pre_fault_memory at
pre_fault_memory_test.c:133 (discriminator 3)
6 (inlined by) main at pre_fault_memory_test.c:140
(discriminator 3)
7 0x00007fcb68429d8f: ?? ??:0
8 0x00007fcb68429e3f: ?? ??:0
9 0x00000000004024e4: _start at ??:?
Invalid virtual address, vaddr: 0xfffffffc00000
+
+ vm_userspace_mem_region_add(vm, VM_MEM_SRC_ANONYMOUS,
+ guest_test_phys_mem, TEST_SLOT, TEST_NPAGES,
+ private ? KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD : 0);
+ virt_map(vm, guest_test_virt_mem, guest_test_phys_mem, TEST_NPAGES);
