Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: selftests: Add KVM/PV clock selftest to prove timer drift correction

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2024-04-19 at 16:54 -0700, Chen, Zide wrote:
> 
> However, the selftest hangs:
> 
> [Apr19 16:15] kselftest: Running tests in kvm
> [Apr19 16:16] rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks:
> [  +0.000628] rcu:      78-...0: (1 GPs behind) idle=3c8c/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=5908/5913 fqs=14025
> [  +0.000468] rcu:      (detected by 104, t=60003 jiffies, g=60073, q=3100 ncpus=128)
> [  +0.000389] Sending NMI from CPU 104 to CPUs 78:
> [  +0.000360] NMI backtrace for cpu 78
> [  +0.000004] CPU: 78 PID: 33515 Comm: pvclock_test Tainted: G O       6.9.0-rc1zide-l0+ #194
> [  +0.000003] Hardware name: Inspur NF5280M7/NF5280M7, BIOS 05.08.01 08/18/2023
> [  +0.000002] RIP: 0010:pvclock_update_vm_gtod_copy+0xb5/0x200 [kvm]

Ah, kvm_get_time_scale() doesn't much like being asked to scale to zero.

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index a07b60351894..45fb99986cf9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -3046,7 +3046,8 @@ static void pvclock_update_vm_gtod_copy(struct kvm *kvm)
 		 * Copy from the field protected solely by ka->tsc_write_lock,
 		 * to the field protected by the ka->pvclock_sc seqlock.
 		 */
-		ka->master_tsc_scaling_ratio = ka->last_tsc_scaling_ratio;
+		ka->master_tsc_scaling_ratio = ka->last_tsc_scaling_ratio ? :
+			kvm_caps.default_tsc_scaling_ratio;
 
 		/*
 		 * Calculate the scaling factors precisely the same way

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux