Re: [PATCH v19 110/130] KVM: TDX: Handle TDX PV MMIO hypercall

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 4/18/2024 5:29 PM, Binbin Wu wrote:

+
+static int tdx_emulate_mmio(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+    struct kvm_memory_slot *slot;
+    int size, write, r;
+    unsigned long val;
+    gpa_t gpa;
+
+    KVM_BUG_ON(vcpu->mmio_needed, vcpu->kvm);
+
+    size = tdvmcall_a0_read(vcpu);
+    write = tdvmcall_a1_read(vcpu);
+    gpa = tdvmcall_a2_read(vcpu);
+    val = write ? tdvmcall_a3_read(vcpu) : 0;
+
+    if (size != 1 && size != 2 && size != 4 && size != 8)
+        goto error;
+    if (write != 0 && write != 1)
+        goto error;
+
+    /* Strip the shared bit, allow MMIO with and without it set. */
Based on the discussion https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZcUO5sFEAIH68JIA@xxxxxxxxxx/
Do we still allow the MMIO without shared bit?

+    gpa = gpa & ~gfn_to_gpa(kvm_gfn_shared_mask(vcpu->kvm));
+
+    if (size > 8u || ((gpa + size - 1) ^ gpa) & PAGE_MASK)
"size > 8u" can be removed, since based on the check of size above, it can't be greater than 8.


+        goto error;
+
+    slot = kvm_vcpu_gfn_to_memslot(vcpu, gpa_to_gfn(gpa));
+    if (slot && !(slot->flags & KVM_MEMSLOT_INVALID))
+        goto error;
+
+    if (!kvm_io_bus_write(vcpu, KVM_FAST_MMIO_BUS, gpa, 0, NULL)) {
Should this be checked for write first?

I check the handle_ept_misconfig() in VMX, it doesn't check write first neither.

Functionally, it should be OK since guest will not read the address range of fast mmio.
So the read case will be filtered out by ioeventfd_write().
But it has take a long way to get to ioeventfd_write().
Isn't it more efficient to check write first?

I got the reason why in handle_ept_misconfig(), it tries to do fast mmio write without checking.
It was intended to make fast mmio faster.
And for ept misconfig case, it's not easy to get the info of read/write.

But in this patch, we have already have read/write info, so maybe we can add the check for write before fast mmio?




+        trace_kvm_fast_mmio(gpa);
+        return 1;
+    }
+
+    if (write)
+        r = tdx_mmio_write(vcpu, gpa, size, val);
+    else
+        r = tdx_mmio_read(vcpu, gpa, size);
+    if (!r) {
+        /* Kernel completed device emulation. */
+        tdvmcall_set_return_code(vcpu, TDVMCALL_SUCCESS);
+        return 1;
+    }
+
+    /* Request the device emulation to userspace device model. */
+    vcpu->mmio_needed = 1;
+    vcpu->mmio_is_write = write;
+    vcpu->arch.complete_userspace_io = tdx_complete_mmio;
+
+    vcpu->run->mmio.phys_addr = gpa;
+    vcpu->run->mmio.len = size;
+    vcpu->run->mmio.is_write = write;
+    vcpu->run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_MMIO;
+
+    if (write) {
+        memcpy(vcpu->run->mmio.data, &val, size);
+    } else {
+        vcpu->mmio_fragments[0].gpa = gpa;
+        vcpu->mmio_fragments[0].len = size;
+        trace_kvm_mmio(KVM_TRACE_MMIO_READ_UNSATISFIED, size, gpa, NULL);
+    }
+    return 0;
+
+error:
+    tdvmcall_set_return_code(vcpu, TDVMCALL_INVALID_OPERAND);
+    return 1;
+}
+
  static int handle_tdvmcall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
  {
      if (tdvmcall_exit_type(vcpu))
@@ -1229,6 +1341,8 @@ static int handle_tdvmcall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
          return tdx_emulate_hlt(vcpu);
      case EXIT_REASON_IO_INSTRUCTION:
          return tdx_emulate_io(vcpu);
+    case EXIT_REASON_EPT_VIOLATION:
+        return tdx_emulate_mmio(vcpu);
      default:
          break;
      }
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 03950368d8db..d5b18cad9dcd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -13975,6 +13975,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_sev_es_string_io);
    EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_entry);
  EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_exit);
+EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_mmio);
  EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_fast_mmio);
  EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_inj_virq);
  EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_page_fault);
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index e27c22449d85..bc14e1f2610c 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -2689,6 +2689,7 @@ struct kvm_memory_slot *kvm_vcpu_gfn_to_memslot(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn
        return NULL;
  }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_vcpu_gfn_to_memslot);
    bool kvm_is_visible_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn)
  {
@@ -5992,6 +5993,7 @@ int kvm_io_bus_read(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, enum kvm_bus bus_idx, gpa_t addr,
      r = __kvm_io_bus_read(vcpu, bus, &range, val);
      return r < 0 ? r : 0;
  }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_io_bus_read);
    int kvm_io_bus_register_dev(struct kvm *kvm, enum kvm_bus bus_idx, gpa_t addr,
                  int len, struct kvm_io_device *dev)







[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux