On Wed, Apr 17, 2024, Alejandro Jimenez wrote: > Use the APICv enablement status to determine if APICV_INHIBIT_REASON_ABSENT > needs to be set, instead of unconditionally setting the reason during > initialization. > > Specifically, in cases where AVIC is disabled via module parameter or lack > of hardware support, unconditionally setting an inhibit reason due to the > absence of an in-kernel local APIC can lead to a scenario where the reason > incorrectly remains set after a local APIC has been created by either > KVM_CREATE_IRQCHIP or the enabling of KVM_CAP_IRQCHIP_SPLIT. This is > because the helpers in charge of removing the inhibit return early if > enable_apicv is not true, and therefore the bit remains set. > > This leads to confusion as to the cause why APICv is not active, since an > incorrect reason will be reported by tracepoints and/or a debugging tool > that examines the currently set inhibit reasons. > > Fixes: ef8b4b720368 ("KVM: ensure APICv is considered inactive if there is no APIC") > Signed-off-by: Alejandro Jimenez <alejandro.j.jimenez@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 15 ++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c > index 26288ca05364..eadd88fabadc 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c > @@ -9999,7 +9999,20 @@ static void kvm_apicv_init(struct kvm *kvm) > > init_rwsem(&kvm->arch.apicv_update_lock); > > - set_or_clear_apicv_inhibit(inhibits, APICV_INHIBIT_REASON_ABSENT, true); > + /* > + * Unconditionally inhibiting APICv due to the absence of in-kernel > + * local APIC can lead to a scenario where APICV_INHIBIT_REASON_ABSENT > + * remains set in the apicv_inhibit_reasons after a local APIC has been > + * created by either KVM_CREATE_IRQCHIP or the enabling of > + * KVM_CAP_IRQCHIP_SPLIT. > + * Hardware support and module parameters governing APICv enablement > + * have already been evaluated and the initial status is available in > + * enable_apicv, so it can be used here to determine if an inhibit needs > + * to be set. > + */ Eh, this is good changelog material, but I don't think it's not necessary for a comment. Readers of this code really should be able to deduce that enable_apicv can't be toggled on, i.e. DISABLE can't go away. > + if (enable_apicv) > + set_or_clear_apicv_inhibit(inhibits, > + APICV_INHIBIT_REASON_ABSENT, true); > > if (!enable_apicv) > set_or_clear_apicv_inhibit(inhibits, This can more concisely be: enum kvm_apicv_inhibit reason = enable_apicv ? APICV_INHIBIT_REASON_ABSENT : APICV_INHIBIT_REASON_DISABLE; set_or_clear_apicv_inhibit(&kvm->arch.apicv_inhibit_reasons, reason, true); init_rwsem(&kvm->arch.apicv_update_lock); which I think also helps the documentation side, e.g. it's shows the VM starts with either ABSENT *or* DISABLE. > -- > 2.39.3 >