On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 11:34 PM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2024, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2024, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > + case RET_PF_EMULATE: > > > + return -EINVAL; > > Almost forgot. EINVAL on emulation is weird. I don't know that any return code > is going to be "good", but I think just about anything is better than EINVAL, > e.g. arguably this could be -EBUSY since retrying after creating a memslot would > succeed. Then I guess -ENOENT? Paolo